Literature DB >> 10845138

If I shouldn't spank, what should I do? Behavioural techniques for disciplining children.

L Tidmarsh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide family physicians with a guide for evaluating discipline problems, giving suggestions for parental guidance, and diagnosing problems when discipline guidance fails. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A MEDLINE and PsycINFO search from 1990 to the present produced articles reviewing research on aspects of discipline. Case-control studies, expert opinion, and position statements published by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Paediatric Society were chosen as a basis for this article. In a special supplement in 1996, a pediatric journal reviewed the controversy of spanking as an effective disciplinary method, with comments by noted researchers and clinicians. Other authors reviewed research evaluating discipline techniques. MAIN MESSAGE: Discipline problems require evaluation of children, parents, and parent-child relationships, including assessment of child development and evaluation of parenting skills and parental stressors. Parents can learn techniques more effective than spanking. Physicians can review discipline strategies and guide parents through difficult situations. Monitoring progress is important, and immediate reassessment of the situation if techniques are failing or referral to a specialist will increase the chances of a successful intervention.
CONCLUSION: Discipline problems are complex and require careful assessment. Guiding parents during these types of problems requires close follow up and reevaluation when methods do not have the expected effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10845138      PMCID: PMC2144894     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  9 in total

Review 1.  Discipline.

Authors:  E R Christophersen
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.278

2.  Attitudes of primary care physicians toward corporal punishment.

Authors:  K F McCormick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  A review of the outcomes of parental use of nonabusive or customary physical punishment.

Authors:  R E Larzelere
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  What clinicians want to know about teaching families new disciplinary tools.

Authors:  L S Wissow
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A blanket injunction against disciplinary use of spanking is not warranted by the data.

Authors:  D Baumrind
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Advising parents on discipline: what works.

Authors:  B J Howard
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Disciplining young children: the role of verbal instructions and reasoning.

Authors:  N J Blum; G E Williams; P C Friman; E R Christophersen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Behavior problems in preschool children: a review of recent research.

Authors:  S B Campbell
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training.

Authors:  R K Chao
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1994-08
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  To spank or not to spank.

Authors:  J Kornelsen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Patterns of Conflict Interaction in Mother-Toddler Dyads: Differences Between Depressed and Non-depressed Mothers.

Authors:  Margaret O'Brien Caughy; Keng-Yen Huang; Julie Lima
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2009-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.