PURPOSE: Vertical diplopia is an uncommon but disappointing complication of otherwise successful local anaesthetic cataract surgery. We studied strabismus patterns in a group of such patients to identify the nature and extent of extraocular muscle involvement. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 15 cases of vertical diplopia following local anaesthetic cataract surgery between July 1994 and January 1998. Peribulbar anaesthesia was used in all cases and given by right-handed professionals. RESULTS: All cases had otherwise successful cataract surgery (mean age 80.5 years; median pre-operative VA 6/18; median post-operative VA 6/9). The mean level of vertical diplopia was 7.2 prism dioptres (PD) in the primary position (range 2-25 PD). The left inferior rectus (IR) was paretic in 6 cases and restricted in 5 cases. The left superior rectus (SR) was not affected in any of the cases. The right IR was restricted in a single case. The right SR was paretic in 2 cases and restricted in a single case. None of the cases had clinical involvement of the oblique muscles. Eleven of the cases were managed successfully with prisms. Two of the cases required strabismus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of left eye extraocular muscle involvement was greater than right eye involvement, although this did not reach statistical significance (73% vs 27%; p = 0.075). This may be due to the more difficult access of right-handed individuals giving left eye peribulbar injections with the needle tract being directed more closely to the muscle cone. The IR muscle is more commonly affected than the SR (80% vs 20%; p = 0.019). An equal incidence of paretic and restricted rectus muscle pathology was found in this study (53% vs 47%; p = 0.818). The exact aetiology of muscle injury is unknown but could be due to direct muscle or nerve trauma, anaesthetic toxicity, periocular haemorrhage or a combination of these.
PURPOSE:Vertical diplopia is an uncommon but disappointing complication of otherwise successful local anaesthetic cataract surgery. We studied strabismus patterns in a group of such patients to identify the nature and extent of extraocular muscle involvement. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 15 cases of vertical diplopia following local anaesthetic cataract surgery between July 1994 and January 1998. Peribulbar anaesthesia was used in all cases and given by right-handed professionals. RESULTS: All cases had otherwise successful cataract surgery (mean age 80.5 years; median pre-operative VA 6/18; median post-operative VA 6/9). The mean level of vertical diplopia was 7.2 prism dioptres (PD) in the primary position (range 2-25 PD). The left inferior rectus (IR) was paretic in 6 cases and restricted in 5 cases. The left superior rectus (SR) was not affected in any of the cases. The right IR was restricted in a single case. The right SR was paretic in 2 cases and restricted in a single case. None of the cases had clinical involvement of the oblique muscles. Eleven of the cases were managed successfully with prisms. Two of the cases required strabismus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of left eye extraocular muscle involvement was greater than right eye involvement, although this did not reach statistical significance (73% vs 27%; p = 0.075). This may be due to the more difficult access of right-handed individuals giving left eye peribulbar injections with the needle tract being directed more closely to the muscle cone. The IR muscle is more commonly affected than the SR (80% vs 20%; p = 0.019). An equal incidence of paretic and restricted rectus muscle pathology was found in this study (53% vs 47%; p = 0.818). The exact aetiology of muscle injury is unknown but could be due to direct muscle or nerve trauma, anaesthetic toxicity, periocular haemorrhage or a combination of these.