Literature DB >> 10844158

Development of stereotypies and polydipsia in wild caught bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) and their laboratory-bred offspring. Is polydipsia a symptom of diabetes mellitus?

.   

Abstract

The development of stereotypies and polydipsia was studied in wild caught bank voles (P: n=92) and their laboratory-bred offspring (F1: n=248). All animals were kept isolated in barren cages in the laboratory. In the P generation, no individuals developed stereotypies, but 22% developed polydipsia (>21 ml/day water intake against normally 10 ml/day). Polydipsia was more frequent among males (34%) than females (13%). In F1, 30% developed locomotor stereotypies alone, 21% showed polydipsia alone, and, additionally, 7% developed both stereotypies and polydipsia. Fewer males than females developed stereotypies (23% vs. 38%), whereas polydipsia was more frequent in males than in females (30% vs. 11%). The occurrence and distribution of polydipsia among sexes were the same in F1 and P. The distribution of different types of stereotypies in stereotyping voles were backward somersaulting (BS, 80%), high-speed jumping (JUMP, 29%), pacing following a fixed route (PF, 12%) and windscreen wiper movement (WIN, 5%). Some individuals (10%) showed two or more different types of stereotypies. The average age for developing stereotypies was 96 days while polydipsia was registered at the age of 63 days in both sexes. Voles showing both polydipsia and stereotypies developed polydipsia later (79 days) than polydipsic voles not showing stereotypies. This difference was especially pronounced in stereotyping females in which the occurrence of polydipsia was postponed to the age of 114 days. Polydipsic voles were tested positive for glucosuria indicating that polydipsia could be a symptom of diabetes mellitus. It is suggested that the development of stereotypies and polydipsia among bank voles in the laboratory are the results of frustration and prolonged stress. Stereotypies seem to depend on frustrative experiences early in life, while polydipsia may be related to diabetes mellitus caused by the experience of prolonged stress. Moreover, circumstances related to the development of stereotypies may be adaptive by reducing the risks of prolonged stress, including the development of fatal polydipsia.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10844158     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  7 in total

1.  Prenatal viral exposure followed by adult stress produces glucose intolerance in a mouse model.

Authors:  B Niklasson; A Samsioe; M Blixt; S Sandler; A Sjöholm; E Lagerquist; A Lernmark; W Klitz
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Diabetes and myocarditis in voles and lemmings at cyclic peak densities--induced by Ljungan virus?

Authors:  Bo Niklasson; Erik Nyholm; Ricardo E Feinstein; Annika Samsioe; Birger Hörnfeldt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of personality and rearing-history on the welfare of captive Asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica).

Authors:  Sitendu Goswami; Praveen C Tyagi; Pradeep K Malik; Shwetank J Pandit; Riyazahmed F Kadivar; Malcolm Fitzpatrick; Samrat Mondol
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Diabetes in Danish bank voles (M. glareolus): survivorship, influence on weight, and evaluation of polydipsia as a screening tool for hyperglycaemia.

Authors:  Bryan Schønecker; Tonny Freimanis; Irene Vejgaard Sørensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters.

Authors:  Tatyana Strekalova; Yvonne Couch; Natalia Kholod; Marco Boyks; Dmitry Malin; Pierre Leprince; Harry Mw Steinbusch
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 6.  Chronic mild stress paradigm as a rat model of depression: facts, artifacts, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Tatyana Strekalova; Yanzhi Liu; Daniel Kiselev; Sharafuddin Khairuddin; Jennifer Lok Yu Chiu; Justin Lam; Ying-Shing Chan; Dmitrii Pavlov; Andrey Proshin; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Daniel C Anthony; Lee Wei Lim
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Extending the Enterovirus Lead: Could a Related Picornavirus be Responsible for Diabetes in Humans?

Authors:  William Klitz; Bo Niklasson
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-09-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.