Literature DB >> 10843450

Comparison of prazosin, terazosin and tamsulosin in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a short-term open, randomized multicenter study. BPH Medical Therapy Study Group. Benign prostatic hyperplasia.

T Tsujii1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this open randomized clinical study was to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of three alpha-1 blockers, prazosin, terazosin and tamsulosin, in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS: The study comprised 121 patients with symptomatic BPH who were randomized to receive 0.5 mg of prazosin twice daily, 0.5 mg of terazosin twice daily or 0.1 mg of tamsulosin once daily for the initial 2 weeks. The doses were doubled for the next 2 weeks. The primary variables assessed were a symptom score, changes in maximum and average urinary flow rate (Qmax and Qave), postvoid residual urine volume and blood pressure.
RESULTS: The percentage changes in the total symptom score from baseline were 38, 39 and 26% at 4 weeks by prazosin, terazosin and tamsulosin, respectively. Terazosin produced significantly higher improvement in four out of nine individual symptoms than tamsulosin (P < 0.05). A significant increase in Qmax or Qave in uroflowmetry was obtained in the prazosin and tamsulosin groups. Blood pressure remained unchanged in normotensive patients, but significantly decreased in hypertensive patients except for the tamsulosin group. Adverse events were minimal in all treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profiles were different among the alpha-1 blockers at standard doses. Tamsulosin appears to be safer than the others for aged patients or patients with hypertension who have impaired blood pressure regulation, while terazosin is significantly effective in improving symptomatic score when compared with the others examined. It is recommended that the alpha-1 blocking agent and its optimal dose are selected on the basis of the baseline characteristics of the patients with symptomatic BPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10843450     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  7 in total

Review 1.  The cardiovascular system.

Authors:  A Moore; A A Mangoni; D Lyons; S H D Jackson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Prazosin: benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Joyce A Generali; Dennis J Cada
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-03

3.  Trends in medical management of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Christopher P Filson; John T Wei; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Comparing the therapeutic outcome of different alpha-blocker treatments for BPH in the same individuals.

Authors:  Temucin Senkul; Omer Yilmaz; Cuneyt Iseri; Cuneyt Adayener; Ilker Akyol; Ferhat Ates
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Association between single nucleotide polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene FokI polymorphism and clinical progress of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Li Ruan; Jian-guo Zhu; Cong Pan; Xing Hua; Dong-bo Yuan; Zheng-ming Li; Wei-de Zhong
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-01-20

6.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monodrug Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Qiu Yuan; Chen Mao; Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong; Zu-Yao Yang; Xiao-Hong Fu; Xiao-Yu Dai; Jin-Ling Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Nocturia: The circadian voiding disorder.

Authors:  Jin Wook Kim; Young Tae Moon; Kyung Do Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-05-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.