BACKGROUND: Thermal ablation of unresectable hepatic tumors can be achieved by cryosurgical ablation (CSA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The relative advantages and disadvantages of each technique have not yet been determined. HYPOTHESIS: Radiofrequency ablation of malignant hepatic neoplasms can be performed safely, but is currently limited by size. Cryosurgical ablation, while associated with higher morbidity, is more effective for larger unresectable hepatic malignant neoplasms. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospective patient database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1992 and September 1999, 308 patients with liver tumors not amenable to curative surgical resection were treated with CSA and/or RFA (percutaneous, laparoscopic, celiotomy). No patient had preoperative evidence of extrahepatic disease. All patients underwent laparoscopy with intraoperative ultrasound if technically possible. Both RFA and CSA were performed under ultrasound guidance. Resection, as an adjunctive procedure, was combined with ablation in certain patients. RESULTS: Laparoscopy identified extrahepatic disease in 12% of patients, and intraoperative hepatic ultrasound identified additional lesions in 33% of patients, despite extensive preoperative imaging. Radiofrequency ablation alone or combined with resection or CSA resulted in reduced blood loss (P<.05), thrombocytopenia (P<.05), and shorter hospital stay compared with CSA alone (P<.05). Median ablation times for lesions greater than 3 cm were 60 minutes with RFA and 15 minutes with CSA (P<.001). Local recurrence rates for lesions greater than 3 cm were also greater with RFA (38% vs 17%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound are essential in staging patients with hepatic malignant neoplasms. Radiofrequency ablation when combined with CSA reduces the morbidity of multiple freezes. Although RFA is safer than CSA and can be performed via different approaches (percutaneously, laparoscopically, or at celiotomy), it is limited by tumor size (<3 cm). Percutaneous RFA should be considered in high-risk patients or those with small local recurrences.
BACKGROUND: Thermal ablation of unresectable hepatic tumors can be achieved by cryosurgical ablation (CSA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The relative advantages and disadvantages of each technique have not yet been determined. HYPOTHESIS: Radiofrequency ablation of malignant hepatic neoplasms can be performed safely, but is currently limited by size. Cryosurgical ablation, while associated with higher morbidity, is more effective for larger unresectable hepatic malignant neoplasms. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospective patient database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1992 and September 1999, 308 patients with liver tumors not amenable to curative surgical resection were treated with CSA and/or RFA (percutaneous, laparoscopic, celiotomy). No patient had preoperative evidence of extrahepatic disease. All patients underwent laparoscopy with intraoperative ultrasound if technically possible. Both RFA and CSA were performed under ultrasound guidance. Resection, as an adjunctive procedure, was combined with ablation in certain patients. RESULTS: Laparoscopy identified extrahepatic disease in 12% of patients, and intraoperative hepatic ultrasound identified additional lesions in 33% of patients, despite extensive preoperative imaging. Radiofrequency ablation alone or combined with resection or CSA resulted in reduced blood loss (P<.05), thrombocytopenia (P<.05), and shorter hospital stay compared with CSA alone (P<.05). Median ablation times for lesions greater than 3 cm were 60 minutes with RFA and 15 minutes with CSA (P<.001). Local recurrence rates for lesions greater than 3 cm were also greater with RFA (38% vs 17%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound are essential in staging patients with hepatic malignant neoplasms. Radiofrequency ablation when combined with CSA reduces the morbidity of multiple freezes. Although RFA is safer than CSA and can be performed via different approaches (percutaneously, laparoscopically, or at celiotomy), it is limited by tumor size (<3 cm). Percutaneous RFA should be considered in high-risk patients or those with small local recurrences.
Authors: Bradford J Wood; Jeffrey R Ramkaransingh; Tito Fojo; McClellan M Walther; Stephen K Libutti Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thilo Schäfer; Jens Sperling; Otto Kollmar; Sven Richter; Martin K Schilling; Michael D Menger; Werner Lindemann Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.571