Literature DB >> 10843308

Are there detectable differences in quality of care or outcome of depression across primary care providers?

W Katon1, C M Rutter, E Lin, G Simon, M Von Korff, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to determine whether there are detectable differences among primary care physicians in measures of quality of care or clinical outcome for depressed patients during the first 2 months of treatment with antidepressant medication.
METHODS: We studied 1,599 depressed primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment from 63 family physicians in 4 primary care clinics of a staff-model health maintenance organization. Patients were interviewed 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication with a telephone structured interview that included the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Diagnoses (SCID). Automated databases of the HMO were used to examine 3 quality-of-care measures: (1) the percentage of patients who had a refill of their antidepressant by 6 weeks, (2) the percentage of patients who had a return visit by 3 weeks, and (3) the percentage of patients having a return visit by 6 weeks. The percentage of patients in each primary care physician panel who had > or =4 persistent DSM-IV depressive symptoms at 6 to 8 weeks was the main clinical outcome variable. To adjust for case-mix differences between physician panels, patient age, gender, and medical comorbidity were controlled for in the analyses. Two covariates were used to adjust for differences in patients' clinical severity: self-report of > or =2 prior depressive episodes and an SCID diagnosis of major depression during the patient's worst episode in the last 2 years. Physician age, gender, and part-time versus full-time practice were also used as covariates.
RESULTS: The wide observed range of variability in quality-of-care and clinical outcome measures by physician practice decreased markedly in the statistical model that controlled for patient-level covariates and differences in the number of patients seen per provider. We did not detect differences in physician practice for the percentage of patients who had a return visit by 3 or 6 weeks, the percentage of patients who had a refill of their antidepressant prescription by 6 weeks, or the percentage of patients with an adverse clinical outcome of depression.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find important differences in measures of quality of care or patient outcomes by physician. These results may have implications for the use of physician profiling and other forms of physician report cards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10843308     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  14 in total

1.  Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.

Authors:  Sarah L Krein; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Clinical improvement associated with conformance to HEDIS-based depression care.

Authors:  Kathryn Rost; L Miriam Dickinson; John Fortney; John Westfall; Richard C Hermann
Journal:  Ment Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06

3.  Longer lengths of stay and higher risk of mortality among inpatients of physicians with more years in practice.

Authors:  William N Southern; Eran Y Bellin; Julia H Arnsten
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Improving the reliability of physician "report cards".

Authors:  Kimberly A Smith; Jeremy B Sussman; Steven J Bernstein; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Application of a propensity score approach for risk adjustment in profiling multiple physician groups on asthma care.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Constantine Frangakis; Francesca Dominici; Gregory B Diette; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Early dropout from psychotherapy for depression with group- and network-model therapists.

Authors:  Gregory E Simon; Victoria Ding; Rebecca Hubbard; Paul Fishman; Evette Ludman; Leo Morales; Belinda Operskalski; James Savarino
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2012-11

Review 7.  Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care.

Authors:  Peter Bower; Sarah Knowles; Peter A Coventry; Nancy Rowland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

8.  The impact of parity on major depression treatment quality in the Federal Employees' Health Benefits Program after parity implementation.

Authors:  Alisa B Busch; Haiden A Huskamp; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Alexander S Young; Howard Goldman; Richard G Frank
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Profiling hospitals for length of stay for treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Harman; Brian J Cuffel; Kelly J Kelleher
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.505

10.  Identifying physician-recognized depression from administrative data: consequences for quality measurement.

Authors:  Claire M Spettell; Terry C Wall; Jeroan Allison; Jaimee Calhoun; Richard Kobylinski; Rachel Fargason; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.