Literature DB >> 10843258

Centrality preferences in choices among similar options.

J I Shaw1, J E Bergen, C A Brown, M E Gallagher.   

Abstract

Three explanations were explored for the finding that people prefer the middle option rather than the extremes when choosing from an array of similar options. In Study 1, 68% chose the middle item from a set of three highlighters and three surveys, whereas 32% chose an item from either end, p < .0001. In Study 2, 71% selected the middle chair from a row of three chairs that were either all empty, or had a backpack occupying either one of the two end chairs, p < .0001. These results support a minimal mental effort principle rather than a preference for symmetry rule. In Study 3, 54.2% recalled more graphic items from the center poster of a 3-poster collage, whereas 31.3% and 14.5% recalled more items from the left and right posters, respectively, p < .004. These findings lend additional support to a focus of attention explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10843258     DOI: 10.1080/00221300009598575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1309


  5 in total

1.  Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-14

2.  Reachability Does Not Explain the Middle Preference: A Comment on Bar-Hillel (2015).

Authors:  Paul Rodway; Astrid Schepman; Volker Thoma
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-03-28

3.  Less healthy breakfast cereals are promoted more frequently in large supermarket chains in Canada.

Authors:  Monique Potvin Kent; Erika Rudnicki; Crystal Usher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data.

Authors:  Takao Noguchi; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.