Literature DB >> 10842930

Concentration and composition of atmospheric aerosols from the 1995 SEAVS experiment and a review of the closure between chemical and gravimetric measurements.

E Andrews1, P Saxena, S Musarra, L M Hildemann, P Koutrakis, P H McMurry, I Olmez, W H White.   

Abstract

We summarize the results from the various measurements and the inter-sampler comparisons from Southeastern Aerosol and Visibility Study (SEAVS), a study with one of its objectives to test for closure among chemical, gravimetric and optical measurements of atmospheric aerosol particles. Sulfate and organics are the dominant components of the SEAVS fine particles (nominally, particles with aerodynamic diameter < or = 2.5 microns) but between 28 and 42% (range over various samplers) of the gravimetrically measured total fine particle concentration is unidentified by the chemical measurements. Estimates of water associated with inorganic components and measurement imprecision do not totally explain the observed difference between gravimetric and chemical measurements. We examine the theoretical and empirical basis for assumptions commonly made in the published literature to extrapolate total fine particle concentration on the basis of chemical measurements of ions, carbon and elements. We then explore the more general question of closure using the SEAVS data as well as data from other, similar studies reported in the literature. In so combining the SEAVS measurements with other similar studies, we find a strong association between organic carbon and the unidentified component, that is, the fraction of the total fine particle concentration not identified by chemical measurements. We offer several tenable hypotheses for the relationship between the organic and unidentified components that deserve to be tested in future work. Specifically, we hypothesize that (1) errors in the sampling and analysis of organic carbon; (2) estimates of organic mass from measurements of organic carbon; and/or (3) water absorption by organics may all contribute to the observed relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842930     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  6 in total

1.  Simulating the production and dispersion of environmental pollutants in aerosol phase in an urban area of great historical and cultural value.

Authors:  Vito Librando; Giuseppe Tringali; Francesca Calastrini; Giovanni Gualtieri
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  4-hours resolution data to study PM10 in a "hot spot" area in Europe.

Authors:  Roberta Vecchi; Vera Bernardoni; Paola Fermo; Franco Lucarelli; Federico Mazzei; Silvia Nava; Paolo Prati; Andrea Piazzalunga; Gianluigi Valli
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Consistent pulmonary and systemic responses from inhalation of fine concentrated ambient particles: roles of rat strains used and physicochemical properties.

Authors:  Urmila P Kodavanti; Mette C Schladweiler; Allen D Ledbetter; John K McGee; Leon Walsh; Peter S Gilmour; Jerry W Highfill; David Davies; Kent E Pinkerton; Judy H Richards; Kay Crissman; Debora Andrews; Daniel L Costa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review.

Authors:  Judith C Chow; Douglas H Lowenthal; L-W Antony Chen; Xiaoliang Wang; John G Watson
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Effects of Early Pollution Control Measures on Secondary Species of PM2.5 in Jiaozuo, China.

Authors:  Junting Tang; Dangyu Song; Wanwan Ji; Liudan Fan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-05

6.  Constraining chemical transport PM2.5 modeling outputs using surface monitor measurements and satellite retrievals: application over the San Joaquin Valley.

Authors:  Mariel D Friberg; Ralph A Kahn; James A Limbacher; K Wyat Appel; James A Mulholland
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 6.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.