Literature DB >> 10842459

The biofiltration of indoor air: implications for air quality.

A Darlington1, M Chan, D Malloch, C Pilger, M A Dixon.   

Abstract

An alternative method of maintaining indoor air quality may be through the biofiltration of air recirculating within the structure rather than the traditional approach of ventilation. This approach is currently being investigated. Prior to its acceptance for dealing with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and CO2, efforts were made to determine whether the incorporation of this amount of biomass into the indoor space can have an (negative) impact on indoor air quality. A relatively large ecologically complex biofilter composed of a ca. 10 m2 bioscrubber, 30 m2 of plantings and a 3,500 litre aquarium were established in a 160 m2 'airtight' room in a recently constructed office building in downtown Toronto. This space maintained ca. 0.2 air changes per hour (ACH) compared to the 15 to 20 ACH (with a 30% refresh rate) of other spaces in the same building. Air quality parameters of concern were total VOCs (TVOCs), formaldehyde and aerial spore counts. TVOC and formaldehyde levels in the biofilter room were the same or significantly less than other spaces in the building despite a much slower refresh rate. Aerial spore levels were slightly higher than other indoor spaces but were well within reported values for 'healthy' indoor spaces. Levels appeared to be dependent on horticultural management practices within the space. Most genera of fungal spores present were common indoors and the other genera were associated with living or dead plant material or soil. From these results, the incorporation of a large amount of biomass associated with indoor biofilters does not in itself lower indoor air quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842459     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010001039.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  2 in total

1.  Indoor-biofilter growth and exposure to airborne chemicals drive similar changes in plant root bacterial communities.

Authors:  Jacob A Russell; Yi Hu; Linh Chau; Margarita Pauliushchyk; Ioannis Anastopoulos; Shivanthi Anandan; Michael S Waring
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies.

Authors:  Bryan E Cummings; Michael S Waring
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.563

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.