BACKGROUND: Advances in molecular biological research have led to identification of prognostic factors such as Trk mRNA expression in primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the CNS and neuroblastoma. To study prospectively the importance of these prognostic factors in large groups of homogeneously treated patients, tumor specimens of good quality must be acquired, preserved, and stored at multiple institutions. Immediate freezing of tumor biopsy samples in liquid nitrogen and storage at -70 degrees C are the most commonly used method of tissue preservation for future RNA analysis. PROCEDURE: To evaluate alternative methods of preserving tissue samples for subsequent RNA analysis, we tested a new RNA stabilization solution. Using tumor tissue of two CNS tumor and one neuroblastoma human xenografts, we compared total RNA isolated from tumor tissue stored for 7 days at room temperature in stabilization solution to that of snap-frozen tissue. The quality of the RNA was studied by spectrophotometry, gel electrophoresis, RT-PCR, and gene expression profiling. RESULTS: No major differences were observed in the quality of RNA isolated from tumor samples stored at room temperature in the RNA stabilization solution compared to snap-frozen tumor samples stored at -70 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality RNA can be prepared from tumor tissue stored at room temperature. Whenever snap freezing is not feasible, pieces of tumor tissue can be treated with RNAlater for subsequent RNA analysis. Short-term storage and shipment of well-preserved tumor tissue are clearly feasible for all institutions, thereby facilitating large multiinstitutional studies of biological prognostic factors. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Advances in molecular biological research have led to identification of prognostic factors such as Trk mRNA expression in primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the CNS and neuroblastoma. To study prospectively the importance of these prognostic factors in large groups of homogeneously treated patients, tumor specimens of good quality must be acquired, preserved, and stored at multiple institutions. Immediate freezing of tumor biopsy samples in liquid nitrogen and storage at -70 degrees C are the most commonly used method of tissue preservation for future RNA analysis. PROCEDURE: To evaluate alternative methods of preserving tissue samples for subsequent RNA analysis, we tested a new RNA stabilization solution. Using tumor tissue of two CNS tumor and one neuroblastomahuman xenografts, we compared total RNA isolated from tumor tissue stored for 7 days at room temperature in stabilization solution to that of snap-frozen tissue. The quality of the RNA was studied by spectrophotometry, gel electrophoresis, RT-PCR, and gene expression profiling. RESULTS: No major differences were observed in the quality of RNA isolated from tumor samples stored at room temperature in the RNA stabilization solution compared to snap-frozen tumor samples stored at -70 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality RNA can be prepared from tumor tissue stored at room temperature. Whenever snap freezing is not feasible, pieces of tumor tissue can be treated with RNAlater for subsequent RNA analysis. Short-term storage and shipment of well-preserved tumor tissue are clearly feasible for all institutions, thereby facilitating large multiinstitutional studies of biological prognostic factors. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Serene M L Lee; Celine Schelcher; Sevdije Gashi; Stefanie Schreiber; Reinhard M K Thasler; Karl-Walter Jauch; Wolfgang E Thasler Journal: Mol Biotechnol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.695
Authors: Anastasia V Suhovskih; Galina M Kazanskaya; Alexander M Volkov; Alexandra Y Tsidulko; Svetlana V Aidagulova; Elvira V Grigorieva Journal: Histochem Cell Biol Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 4.304
Authors: Blanaid C Mee; Paul Carroll; Simona Donatello; Elizabeth Connolly; Mairead Griffin; Barbara Dunne; Louise Burke; Richard Flavin; Hala Rizkalla; Ciara Ryan; Brian Hayes; Charles D'Adhemar; Niamh Banville; Nazia Faheem; Cian Muldoon; Eoin F Gaffney Journal: Biopreserv Biobank Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Tih-Shih Lee; Shrikant Mane; Tore Eid; Hongyu Zhao; Aiping Lin; Zhong Guan; Jung H Kim; Jeffrey Schweitzer; David King-Stevens; Peter Weber; Susan S Spencer; Dennis D Spencer; Nihal C de Lanerolle Journal: Mol Med Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: George L Mutter; David Zahrieh; Chunmei Liu; Donna Neuberg; David Finkelstein; Heather E Baker; Janet A Warrington Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Amelie Fassbender; Nilufer Rahmioglu; Allison F Vitonis; Paola Viganò; Linda C Giudice; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Lone Hummelshoj; G David Adamson; Christian M Becker; Stacey A Missmer; Krina T Zondervan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Peter Ruschpler; Peter Lorenz; Wolfram Eichler; Dirk Koczan; Claudia Hänel; Roger Scholz; Christian Melzer; Hans-Jürgen Thiesen; Peter Stiehl Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 5.156