Literature DB >> 10842111

Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.

K Tahmina1, E Tanaka, K Tanne.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate morphologic features of the craniofacial skeleton in treated adolescent patients with Class III malocclusion. Fifty-six subjects were divided into 2 groups, with and without acceptable treatment outcomes, which were referred to as the stable and the unstable groups. The mean age at the initial stage was 9 years 3 months in the stable group and 9 years 4 months in the unstable group. All subjects underwent chincup therapy, with a mean duration of 3 years 9 months. On the basis of lateral cephalograms taken at 4 different stages, the means of the z scores for 20 measurements were calculated and compared between the 2 groups by means of the Student t test. Discriminant analysis was also conducted to extract key determinants to discriminate between the 2 groups. The gonial angle was significantly larger in the unstable group than in the stable group at the initial stage, and this increased over time. The mandible of the unstable group exhibited downward-and-backward rotation during early treatment and then rotated in an upward-and-forward direction after the correction of the anterior crossbite. A significant forward growth of the mandible was also found in the unstable group for the same period. Furthermore, the gonial, N-A-Pog, and ramus plane to SN plane angles were selected as the significant variables for discriminating the 2 groups with a high precision. In conclusion, it is shown that upward-and-forward rotation of the mandible, in combination with the forward growth and displacement, is highly associated with unsatisfactory treatment outcomes after pubertal growth in growing Class III patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  3D soft tissue analysis--part 2: vertical parameters.

Authors:  Janka Kochel; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Michael Kochel; Susanne Schneck; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Kwak; Hae-Jin Park; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

4.  Removable plate treatment of anterior forced crossbite: Effectiveness, efficiency, and potential outcome predictors.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Heidi Klewitz; Helge Hudel; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Orthodontic considerations for maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing patients with cleft lip and palate using internal distractors.

Authors:  Adriana da Silveira; Pollyana Marques de Moura; Raymond J Harshbarger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram.

Authors:  Pillai Devu Radhakrishnan; Nilambur Kovilakam Sapna Varma; Vallikat Velath Ajith
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-06-22

7.  Compensation of skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth: Part 2: Skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue parameters in comparison with nonextraction Class III therapies.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Gaida; Henning Dathe
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Adult Class III treatment using a J-hook headgear to the mandibular arch.

Authors:  Yasuko Kuroda; Shingo Kuroda; Richard G Alexander; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 9.  Efficacy of short-term chincup therapy for mandibular growth retardation in Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Z P Liu; C J Li; H K Hu; J W Chen; F Li; S J Zou
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Is There Any Difference Between Gonial Angle Values Measured on Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Orthopantomograms?

Authors:  Demet Kaya
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.