Literature DB >> 10840417

Selective nonoperative management of blunt grade 5 renal injury.

A L Altman1, C Haas, K H Dinchman, J P Spirnak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the feasibility of a nonoperative approach to blunt grade 5 renal injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with grade 5 renal injury who presented to our level 1 trauma center from 1993 to 1998. Those treated nonoperatively and surgically were assigned to groups 1 and 2, respectively. Each group was compared with respect to the initial emergency department evaluation, computerized tomography findings, associated injuries, duration of hospital stay and intensive care unit stay, transfusion requirements, complications and followup imaging.
RESULTS: Of 218 renal injuries evaluated 13 were grade 5. In group 1, 6 patients were treated nonoperatively and in group 2, 7 underwent exploration. Each group had similar average hospitalization (12.0 and 12.8 days, respectively). Patients in group 1 had fewer intensive care unit days (4.3 versus 9.0), significantly lower transfusion requirements (2.7 versus 25.2 units, p = 0.0124) and fewer complications during the hospital course. Followup computerized tomography of nonoperatively managed cases revealed functioning renal parenchyma with resolution of retroperitoneal hematoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of blunt grade 5 renal injury is feasible in patients who are hemodynamically stable at presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10840417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

1.  Transcatheter arterial embolization in the trauma patient: a review.

Authors:  Jason R Bauer; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Conservative management vs early surgery for high grade pediatric renal trauma--do nephrectomy rates differ?

Authors:  Micah A Jacobs; James M Hotaling; Beth A Mueller; Martin Koyle; Frederick Rivara; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  [Renal trauma: is open surgery still up to date?].

Authors:  W Diederichs; S Mutze
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Contemporary evaluation and management of renal trauma].

Authors:  U Krafft
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Conservative Management of High-grade Renal Trauma Does Not Lead to Prolonged Hospital Stay.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Kushan D Radadia; Anobel Y Odisho; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Readmission after treatment of Grade 3 and 4 renal injuries at a Level I trauma center: Statewide assessment using the Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System.

Authors:  Brian Winters; Hunter Wessells; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Angiointervention: high rates of failure following blunt renal injuries.

Authors:  Jay Menaker; Bellal Joseph; Deborah M Stein; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Conservative management of a grade 4 renal laceration in a child.

Authors:  S J Freedland; K S Eilber; G S Palapattu; J Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

9.  Endovascular management of grade V blunt renal trauma with associated splenic injury.

Authors:  Arun Sahai; Faye Cuthbert; Ramon Niekrash; Midhat Siddiqui; Manpreet Singh Gulati
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Review of the evidence on the management of blunt renal trauma in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Jason D Fraser; Pablo Aguayo; Daniel J Ostlie; Shawn D St Peter
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.