BACKGROUND: Tumor venous invasion in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequent and can be macroscopic and microscopic or microscopic alone. Although macroscopic invasion is a well-established prognostic indicator, the clinical significance of microscopic invasion remains unclear. METHODS: There were 322 patients enrolled who had undergone curative resection for HCC. The clinicopathologic factors and prognostic significance associated with macroscopic and microscopic venous invasion were analyzed. RESULTS: Macroscopic invasion was observed in 50 patients (15.5%) and microscopic invasion in 190 (59.0%). The larger the tumor, the more the incidence of venous invasion. There were 140 patients with microscopic invasion only (Group 1). Patients with macroscopic invasion (Group 2, n = 50) also had microscopic invasion. Compared with patients without venous invasion (Group 3, n = 132), Group 1 had a higher alpha-fetoprotein level, a larger tumor size, and more tumors without encapsulation. For group 1, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 65.6%, 41.6%, and 30.8%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 87. 8%, 60.0%, and 52.7%, respectively. The survival rates of group 1 were lower than those of group 3 and higher than those of group 2 (P <.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that microscopic and macroscopic venous invasion, surgical margin, indocyanine-green retention, and tumor size and number were significant predictors of postresectional survival. CONCLUSIONS: In HCC patients, microscopic venous invasion is frequent and related independently to postresectional outcome.
BACKGROUND:Tumor venous invasion in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequent and can be macroscopic and microscopic or microscopic alone. Although macroscopic invasion is a well-established prognostic indicator, the clinical significance of microscopic invasion remains unclear. METHODS: There were 322 patients enrolled who had undergone curative resection for HCC. The clinicopathologic factors and prognostic significance associated with macroscopic and microscopic venous invasion were analyzed. RESULTS: Macroscopic invasion was observed in 50 patients (15.5%) and microscopic invasion in 190 (59.0%). The larger the tumor, the more the incidence of venous invasion. There were 140 patients with microscopic invasion only (Group 1). Patients with macroscopic invasion (Group 2, n = 50) also had microscopic invasion. Compared with patients without venous invasion (Group 3, n = 132), Group 1 had a higher alpha-fetoprotein level, a larger tumor size, and more tumors without encapsulation. For group 1, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 65.6%, 41.6%, and 30.8%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 87. 8%, 60.0%, and 52.7%, respectively. The survival rates of group 1 were lower than those of group 3 and higher than those of group 2 (P <.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that microscopic and macroscopic venous invasion, surgical margin, indocyanine-green retention, and tumor size and number were significant predictors of postresectional survival. CONCLUSIONS: In HCC patients, microscopic venous invasion is frequent and related independently to postresectional outcome.
Authors: Al B Benson; Thomas A Abrams; Edgar Ben-Josef; P Mark Bloomston; Jean F Botha; Bryan M Clary; Anne Covey; Steven A Curley; Michael I D'Angelica; Rene Davila; William D Ensminger; John F Gibbs; Daniel Laheru; Mokenge P Malafa; Jorge Marrero; Steven G Meranze; Sean J Mulvihill; James O Park; James A Posey; Jasgit Sachdev; Riad Salem; Elin R Sigurdson; Constantinos Sofocleous; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Alan P Venook; Laura Williams Goff; Yun Yen; Andrew X Zhu Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Brian K P Goh; Pierce K H Chow; Jin-Yao Teo; Jen-San Wong; Chung-Yip Chan; Peng-Chung Cheow; Alexander Y F Chung; London L P J Ooi Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Suk Kyeong Ji; Yun Ku Cho; Yong Sik Ahn; Mi Young Kim; Yoon Ok Park; Jae Kyun Kim; Wan Tae Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.500