Literature DB >> 10840300

Mistakes on EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma: error in interpretation or deception from innate pathologic features?

S A McClave1, W F Jones, G M Woolfolk, G R Schrodt, M J Wiersema.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) accuracy for staging gastrointestinal tract tumors is limited by many factors, this study was designed to analyze potential sources of error in the EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma.
METHODS: All patients referred for EUS evaluation of colorectal carcinoma were staged prospectively by one ultrasonographer and retrospectively by two others with EUS videotape recordings. Pathologic staging was done independently in a blinded fashion. Deceptive pathologic features were defined for T staging by presence of inflammation extending beyond tumor or microscopic spread without inflammation extending to a level consistent with the next stage, and for N staging by large (> or = 10 mm) benign lymph nodes or small (< 10 mm) malignant lymph nodes.
RESULTS: Of 22 patients entered into the study, an inflammatory reaction around microscopic tumor spread thought to actually enhance detection by EUS was present in 57.1% of cases. Nine deceptive pathologic lesions were present in 36.4% (8 of 22) of patients (5 T stage, 4 N stage lesions). Of 40 T and N stage mistakes made by the three physicians, 45% were made in the presence and 55% in the absence of deceptive pathologic lesions. Accuracy increased significantly from the presence to absence of deceptive pathologic lesions, from 53.3% to 83.7% (p = 0.029) for T stage, and 8.3% to 73. 1% for N stage (p = 0.0001). Confidence of T staging correlated significantly with accuracy, increasing from 63.3% when unsure to 88. 2% with staging certainty (p = 0.017), an effect not seen for N staging.
CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation and desmoplasia around colorectal carcinoma are often present, but may actually enhance EUS detection of microscopic tumor spread. Deceptive pathologic lesions are present in only one third of patients, but account for almost half (45%) of the errors in T and N staging by EUS. Diagnostic accuracy for EUS was increased with confidence in T stage assessment (but not N stage) and in the absence of deceptive pathologic lesions. Errors in interpretation still accounted for the majority of mistakes (55%) made in EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10840300     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.106310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

1.  Hazards of endoscopic biopsy for flat adenoma before endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Kuangi Fu; Yasushi Sano; Shigeharu Kato; Takahiro Fujii; Junko Iwasaki; Masanori Sugito; Masato Ono; Norio Saito; Shigeaki Yoshida; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

3.  Endorectal ultrasound in the identification of rectal tumors for transanal endoscopic surgery: factors influencing its accuracy.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Ana Gálvez; Laura Mora-López; Pere Rebasa; Sheila Serra-Pla; Anna Pallisera-Lloveras; Carla Zerpa; Oriol Moreno; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Colorectal Carcinoma: Local Tumor Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis by High-Resolution MR Imaging in Surgical Specimens.

Authors:  Ichiro Yamada; Norio Yoshino; Akemi Tetsumura; Satoshi Okabe; Masayuki Enomoto; Kenichi Sugihara; Jiro Kumagai; Hitoshi Shibuya
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-01-31

5.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of various endoscopic examination techniques for evaluating the invasion depth of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Satomi Haruki; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Kaoru Yokoyama; Miwa Sada; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.