OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of depressive symptoms on asthma patients' reports of functional status and health-related quality of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care internal medicine practice at a tertiary care center in New York City. PATIENTS: We studied 230 outpatients between the ages of 18 and 62 years with moderate asthma. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were interviewed in person in English or Spanish with two health-related quality-of-life measures, the disease-specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (possible score range, 1 to 7; higher scores reflect better function) and the generic Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 (general population mean is 50 for both the Physical Component Summary [PCS] score and Mental Component Summary [MCS] score). Patients also completed a screen for depressive symptoms, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and a global question regarding current disease activity. Stepwise multivariate analyses were conducted with the AQLQ and SF-36 scores as the dependent variables and depressive symptoms, comorbidity, asthma, and demographic characteristics as independent variables. The mean age of patients was 41 +/- SD 11 years and 83% were women. The mean GDS score was 11 +/- SD 8 (possible range, 0 to 30; higher scores reflect more depressive symptoms), and a large percentage of patients, 45%, scored above the threshold considered positive for depression screening. Compared with patients with a negative screen for depressive symptoms, patients with a positive screen had worse composite AQLQ scores (3.9 +/- SD 1.3 vs 2.8 +/- SD 0.8, P <.0001) and worse PCS scores (40 +/- SD 11 vs 34 +/- SD 8, P <.0001) and worse MCS scores (48 +/- SD 11 vs 32 +/- SD 10, P <.0001) scores. In stepwise analyses, current asthma activity and GDS scores had the greatest effects on patient-reported health-related quality of life, accounting for 36% and 11% of the variance, respectively, for the composite AQLQ, and 11% and 38% of the variance, respectively, for the MCS in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of asthma patients in this study had a positive screen for depressive symptoms. Asthma patients with more depressive symptoms reported worse health-related quality of life than asthma patients with similar disease activity but fewer depressive symptoms. Given the new emphasis on functional status and health-related quality of life measured by disease-specific and general health scales, we conclude that psychological status indicators should also be considered when patient-derived measures are used to assess outcomes in asthma.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of depressive symptoms on asthmapatients' reports of functional status and health-related quality of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care internal medicine practice at a tertiary care center in New York City. PATIENTS: We studied 230 outpatients between the ages of 18 and 62 years with moderate asthma. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Patients were interviewed in person in English or Spanish with two health-related quality-of-life measures, the disease-specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (possible score range, 1 to 7; higher scores reflect better function) and the generic Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 (general population mean is 50 for both the Physical Component Summary [PCS] score and Mental Component Summary [MCS] score). Patients also completed a screen for depressive symptoms, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and a global question regarding current disease activity. Stepwise multivariate analyses were conducted with the AQLQ and SF-36 scores as the dependent variables and depressive symptoms, comorbidity, asthma, and demographic characteristics as independent variables. The mean age of patients was 41 +/- SD 11 years and 83% were women. The mean GDS score was 11 +/- SD 8 (possible range, 0 to 30; higher scores reflect more depressive symptoms), and a large percentage of patients, 45%, scored above the threshold considered positive for depression screening. Compared with patients with a negative screen for depressive symptoms, patients with a positive screen had worse composite AQLQ scores (3.9 +/- SD 1.3 vs 2.8 +/- SD 0.8, P <.0001) and worse PCS scores (40 +/- SD 11 vs 34 +/- SD 8, P <.0001) and worse MCS scores (48 +/- SD 11 vs 32 +/- SD 10, P <.0001) scores. In stepwise analyses, current asthma activity and GDS scores had the greatest effects on patient-reported health-related quality of life, accounting for 36% and 11% of the variance, respectively, for the composite AQLQ, and 11% and 38% of the variance, respectively, for the MCS in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of asthmapatients in this study had a positive screen for depressive symptoms. Asthmapatients with more depressive symptoms reported worse health-related quality of life than asthmapatients with similar disease activity but fewer depressive symptoms. Given the new emphasis on functional status and health-related quality of life measured by disease-specific and general health scales, we conclude that psychological status indicators should also be considered when patient-derived measures are used to assess outcomes in asthma.
Authors: G C Lyketsos; A Karabetsos; J Jordanoglou; T Liokis; A Armagianidis; C G Lyketsos Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 1984 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Caroline P Carney; Tomoko R Sampson; Paul M Peloso; Robert F Woolson; Donald W Black; Bradley N Doebbeling Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Elizabeth P Lowery; Paul K Henneberger; Richard Rosiello; Susan R Sama; Peggy Preusse; Don K Milton Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Polly Hitchcock Noël; John W Williams; Jürgen Unützer; Jason Worchel; Shuko Lee; John Cornell; Wayne Katon; Linda H Harpole; Enid Hunkeler Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Theodore A Omachi; Patricia P Katz; Edward H Yelin; Carlos Iribarren; Sara J Knight; Paul D Blanc; Mark D Eisner Journal: Chest Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 9.410