Vocational rehabilitation--early versus delayed. The effect of early vocational rehabilitation compared to delayed vocational rehabilitation among employed and unemployed, long-term sick-listed people.

The aim of the present study was to examine whether the wait before vocational rehabilitation affected the outcome for employed and unemployed, long-term sick-listed people. The study is based on sick-leave cases 90 days or longer, which started during 1992-1994 in a rural area in Sweden. The study included all sick-leavers with non-malignant musculoskeletal diagnoses from the neck, shoulder and back regions and who had undergone vocational rehabilitation. Of these, 391 were employed and 78 unemployed. Our hypothesis was that those who undergo early vocational rehabilitation, irrespective of employment status, often get well sooner, have fewer sick days and lower benefit levels after vocational rehabilitation than those who have to wait a long time for their rehabilitation. Our hypothesis was supported only regarding the employed who mainly reported well at 6 and 12 months after vocational rehabilitation. In the longer term (24 months) the effect was however no longer evident. Earlier studies indicate that more factors than an early start to rehabilitation are important for a successful outcome. A more important factor is probably that the right measures have been initiated at the right time, that the measures are of high quality and that the sick-leaver is mentally prepared for the measure. Although early vocational rehabilitation did not prove to be a determining factor for a successful outcome there is still reason to emphasize early involvement in the case to guarantee rehabilitation of high quality.