Literature DB >> 10839424

The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty.

O O Erol1.   

Abstract

In nose surgery, carved or crushed cartilage used as a graft has some disadvantages, chiefly that it may be perceptible through the nasal skin after tissue resolution is complete. To overcome these problems and to obtain a smoother surface, the authors initiated the use of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage. This innovative technique has been used by the authors on 2365 patients over the past 10 years: in 165 patients with traumatic nasal deformity, in 350 patients with postrhinoplasty deformity, and in 1850 patients during primary rhinoplasty. The highlights of the surgical procedure include harvested cartilage (septal, alar, conchal, and sometimes costal) cut in pieces of 0.5 to 1 mm using a no. 11 blade. The fine-textured cartilage mass is then wrapped in one layer of Surgicel and moistened with an antibiotic (rifamycin). The graft is then molded into a cylindrical form and inserted under the dorsal nasal skin. In the lateral wall and tip of the nose, some overcorrection is performed depending on the type of deformity. When the mucosal stitching is complete, this graft can be externally molded, like plasticine, under the dorsal skin. In cases of mild-to-moderate nasal depression, septal and conchal cartilages are used in the same manner to augment the nasal dorsum with consistently effective and durable results. In cases with more severe defects of the nose, costal cartilage is necessary to correct both the length of the nose and the projection of the columella. In patients with recurrent deviation of the nasal bridge, this technique provided a simple solution to the problem. After overexcision of the dorsal part of deviated septal cartilage and insertion of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage, a straight nose was obtained in all patients with no recurrence (follow-up of 1 to 10 years). The technique also proved to be highly effective in primary rhinoplasties to camouflage bone irregularities after hump removal in patients with thin nasal skin and/or in cases when excessive hump removal was performed. As a complication, in six patients early postoperative swelling was more than usual. In 16 patients, overcorrection was persistent owing to fibrosis, and in 11 patients resorption was excessive beyond the expected amount. A histologic evaluation was possible in 16 patients, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, by removing thin slices of excess cartilage from the dorsum of the nose during touch-up surgery. This graft showed a mosaic-type alignment of graft cartilage with fibrous tissue connection among the fragments. In conclusion, this type of graft is very easy to apply, because a plasticine-like material is obtained that can be molded with the fingers, giving a smooth surface with desirable form and long-lasting results in all cases. The favorable results obtained by this technique have led the authors to use Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage routinely in all types of rhinoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10839424     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200005000-00051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  46 in total

1.  Sandwich technique in nasal dorsal augmentation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Issing; Shahram Anari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  An overview of nasal dorsal augmentation.

Authors:  Harley S Dresner; Peter A Hilger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Stabilization of costal cartilage graft warping using infrared laser irradiation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Allen Foulad; Pedram Ghasri; Rohit Garg; Brian Wong
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

4.  Rhinoplasty in the Hispanic patient.

Authors:  Stephen Higuera; Daniel A Hatef; Samuel Stal
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Rhinoplasty: the african american patient.

Authors:  Adeyiza O Momoh; Daniel A Hatef; Anthony Griffin; Anthony E Brissett
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 6.  Imaging features of rhinoplasty.

Authors:  C J Schatz; D T Ginat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  A New Era of Diced Cartilage Rhinoplasty: Our Experience.

Authors:  S K Singh; Tarun Sood; K Sabarigirish; N Ramakrishnan; Renu Rajguru; K Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-14

8.  Primary rhinoplasty: An Indian perspective.

Authors:  Uday Bhat; Bharat Patel
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2008-10

9.  Diced cartilage: an effective graft for post-traumatic and revision rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Brajendra Baser; Shenal Kothari; Manya Thakur
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-02-25

10.  Study of Outcome of an Implanted Autologous Auricular Cartilage: A Preliminary Experimental Research in Rabbits.

Authors:  B P Belaldavar; R S Mudhol; Vijaylaxmi Dhorigol; Chetan Belaldavar; Satish Desai; Rishav Garg; Onkar Deshmukh; Mohit Sinha; S Ganesh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.