Literature DB >> 10838148

Is the organisation of goal-directed action modality specific? A common temporal structure.

P H Weiss1, M Jeannerod, Y Paulignan, H J Freund.   

Abstract

With the help of kinematic analysis, the temporal organization of the complex daily activity 'drinking from a bottle with a glass' was described in detail. The analysis focused on the sequential action structure, the prehensile acts, and the bimanual coordination as well as on the effect of different instruction modalities on these parameters to explore the underlying representation for this complex action. Movements of the two arms were recorded in three-dimensional space with the help of an optoelectronic device in 12 normal subjects under four conditions: (1) action pantomime after verbal instruction; (2) action imitation after observation of the action performed by the experimenter without the objects; (3) action pantomime while seeing, but not touching the objects; and finally (4) action execution with objects. Despite high execution variability, the temporal structure of the action could be precisely described by the relative duration and peak velocity of action segments, by the MGA-object size-correlation, and by linear regression analysis between the onsets of functionally related action segments. A similar structure of the action as characterized by these kinematic parameters was retained across different instruction modalities. Only when the action was executed with the objects, the interval between the movement onsets of either hand and the peak velocity of the manipulative acts were reduced, while no change was observed across the other three instruction modalities. This stability of the temporal structure suggests the existence of a level in the representation of an action where all the modalities converge.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10838148     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00029-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review.

Authors:  G Wulf; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Functional synchronization in repetitive bimanual prehension movements.

Authors:  Marianne I Christel; Marc Jeannerod; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits?

Authors:  Sandy McCombe Waller; Jill Whitall
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Signs of Pretense Across Age and Scenario.

Authors:  Angeline Lillard; Tracy Nishida; Davide Massaro; Amrisha Vaish; Lili Ma; Gerald McRoberts
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2007-01-01

Review 5.  Applying principles of motor learning and control to upper extremity rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lisa M Muratori; Eric M Lamberg; Lori Quinn; Susan V Duff
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  Grasp it loudly! Supporting actions with semantically congruent spoken action words.

Authors:  Raphaël Fargier; Mathilde Ménoret; Véronique Boulenger; Tatjana A Nazir; Yves Paulignan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How a lateralized brain supports symmetrical bimanual tasks.

Authors:  Roland S Johansson; Anna Theorin; Göran Westling; Mikael Andersson; Yukari Ohki; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Effects of Stroke on Ipsilesional End-Effector Kinematics in a Multi-Step Activity of Daily Living.

Authors:  Philipp Gulde; Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Does gesture strengthen sensorimotor knowledge of objects? The case of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Wim Pouw; Stephanie I Wassenburg; Autumn B Hostetter; Bjorn B de Koning; Fred Paas
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.