Literature DB >> 10837955

Prospective trial of preoperative concomitant boost radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer.

N A Janjan1, C N Crane, B W Feig, K Cleary, R Dubrow, S A Curley, L M Ellis, J Vauthey, R Lenzi, P Lynch, R Wolff, T Brown, R Pazdur, J Abbruzzese, P M Hoff, P Allen, B Brown, J Skibber.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: To evaluate the response to a concomitant boost given during standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Concomitant boost radiotherapy was administered preoperatively to 45 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in a prospective trial. Treatment consisted of 45 Gy to the pelvis with 18 mV photons at 1.8 Gy/fraction using a 3-field belly board technique with continuous infusion 5FU chemotherapy (300mg/m(2)) 5 days per week. The boost was given during the last week of therapy with a 6-hour inter-fraction interval to the tumor plus a 2-3 cm margin. The boost dose equaled 7.5 Gy/5 fractions (1.5 Gy/fraction); a total dose of 52.5 Gy/5 weeks was given to the primary tumor. Pretreatment tumor stage, determined by endorectal ultrasound and CT scan, included 29 with T3N0 [64%], 11 T3N1, 1 T3Nx, 2 T4N0, 1 T4N3, and 1 with TxN1 disease. Mean distance from the anal verge was 5 cm (range 0-13 cm). Median age was 55 years (range 33-77 years). The population consisted of 34 males and 11 females. Median time of follow-up is 8 months (range 1-24 months).
RESULTS: Sphincter preservation (SP) has been accomplished in 33 of 42 (79%) patients resected to date. Three patients did not undergo resection because of the development of metastatic disease in the interim between the completion of chemoradiation (CTX/XRT) and preoperative evaluation. The surgical procedures included proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis (n = 16), low anterior resection (n = 13), transanal resection (n = 4). Tumor down-staging was pathologically confirmed in 36 of the 42 (86%) resected patients, and 13 (31%) achieved a pathologic CR. Among the 28 tumors (67%) located <6 cm from the anal verge, SP was accomplished in 21 cases (75%). Although perioperative morbidity was higher, toxicity rates during CTX/XRT were comparable to that seen with conventional fractionation. Compared to our contemporary experience with conventional CTX/XRT (45Gy; 1.8 Gy per fraction), improvements were seen in SP (79% vs. 59%; p = 0.02), SP for tumors <6 cm from the anal verge (75% vs. 42%; p = 0.003), and down-staging (86% vs. 62%; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: The SP rate with concomitant boost radiation has been highly favorable with rates of response which are higher than those previously reported for chemoradiation without administration of a boost. Further evaluation of this radiotherapeutic strategy appears warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10837955     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00418-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

Review 1.  Non-operative management of rectal cancer: understanding tumor biology.

Authors:  Iris H Wei; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on experimental colon anastomosis after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ramazan Yildiz; Mehmet Fatih Can; Gokhan Yagci; Taner Ozgurtas; Metin Guden; Mehmet Gamsizkan; Erkan Ozturk; Sadettin Cetiner
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

3.  Prospective phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-hong Park; Jong Hoon Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Sang-wook Lee; Seong Soo Shin; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Hee Cheol Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang; Tae Won Kim; Heung Moon Chang; Min Hee Ryu; Eun Kyung Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Adjuvant therapy sparing in rectal cancer achieving complete response after chemoradiation.

Authors:  Xabier García-Albéniz; Rosa Gallego; Ralf Dieter Hofheinz; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; Juan Ramón Ayuso-Colella; Josep Antoni Bombí; Carles Conill; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Angels Ginés; Rosa Miquel; Mario Pagés; Estela Pineda; Verónica Pereira; Aarón Sosa; Oscar Reig; Iván Victoria; Luis Feliz; Antonio María de Lacy; Antoni Castells; Iris Burkholder; Andreas Hochhaus; Joan Maurel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Local excision of T2 and T3 rectal cancers after downstaging chemoradiation.

Authors:  C J Kim; T J Yeatman; D Coppola; A Trotti; B Williams; J S Barthel; W Dinwoodie; R C Karl; J Marcet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies.

Authors:  Robert Glynne-Jones; Miranda Kronfli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Risk factors for wound complications in patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal defect after total proctectomy.

Authors:  Marco Bertucci Zoccali; Alberto Biondi; Mukta Krane; Essie Kueberuwa; Gianluca Rizzo; Roberto Persiani; Claudio Coco; Roger D Hurst; Domenico D'Ugo; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Yuji Seo; Timothy J Kinsella
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

9.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of select rectal cancers or tumors suspicious for cancer.

Authors:  J H Marks; C Marchionni; G J Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Paola De Nardi; Michele Carvello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.