Literature DB >> 10837041

Rhetoric or reality? The participation of disabled people in NGO planning.

J Flower1, S Wirz.   

Abstract

User involvement in planning is now well established in the fields of both health and development. This study looks at one particular client group, namely disabled people, and addresses the question: How do selected European-based international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) facilitate the participation of disabled people in their planning process? The study was exploratory in nature, using both quantitative and qualitative methods to answer the research question. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with 18 INGOs, which was supported by five semi-structured interviews and 20 'e-mail dialogues' with key informants. The findings indicate that the INGOs involve disabled people's organizations (DPOs) in their planning of services and projects in a variety of ways. Most commonly this is through sharing information with them, but consulting them, including them in decision-making or supporting action initiated by them are other less frequent methods of involvement. INGOs with a specific disability focus involve disabled people in the ways described above more frequently than other INGOs. Although most INGOs regularly provide information and consult DPOs, if there is no assurance that ideas raised will be implemented, then there is no guarantee of DPOs' participation in the planning process of these INGOs. The focus of an INGO and the nature of its projects affect how disabled people are involved in planning, whereas the size of an INGO has little effect. INGOs thus far have failed to match their expressed intentions about participation, but as they help to strengthen DPOs, encourage their formation and move to make disability an issue that cuts across sectoral boundaries, INGOs are changing. There is still a lot of rhetoric about participation, but the participation of disabled people in the planning process of INGOs is a growing reality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10837041     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/15.2.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  2 in total

1.  Ethics and Community-Based Rehabilitation: Eight Ethical Questions from a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephen Clarke; Jessica Barudin; Matthew Hunt
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Disabled people's organisations and the disability movement: Perspectives from Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Lara Bezzina
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2019-04-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.