Literature DB >> 10836510

Parasite communities of the Salzhaff (Northwest Mecklenburg, Baltic Sea) II. Guild communities, with special regard to snails, benthic crustaceans, and small-sized fish.

C D Zander1, L W Reimer, K Barz, G Dietel, U Strohbach.   

Abstract

Metazoan parasites of guilds of benthic snails and crustaceans and of four fish families--Gobiidae, Gasterosteidae, Syngnathidae, and Zoarcidae--were investigated off the brackish Salzhaff area (Southwest Baltic) in the semienclosed Salzhaff and the near Rerik Riff in the free Baltic. Comparisons revealed greater similarities in parasite populations and communities within the fish guilds than between them. According to an evaluation of the core-/satellite-species concept using abundance values, the most important parasites of fish were some generalists, such as Cryptocotyle spp., Podocotyle atomon, and Diplostomum spathaceum, as well as some specialists, such as Acanthostomum balthicum, Thersitina gasterostei, and Aphalloides timmi. These specialists revealed high degrees of prevalence in their main hosts and lower degrees in one or two by-hosts. Additional importance is assigned to parasites that cause harm to their hosts due to their large size, e.g., Schistocephalus spp., or via massive infestation, e.g., several digenean metacercariae. Because specialists were more prominent in snails and fish from the Rerik Riff, the correlation of host numbers with prevalence resulted in only a slight increase instead of a more rapid rise in regression among crustaceans and fish from the entire Salzhaff, where the generalists were more prevalent. The selected host guilds demonstrated the entire life cycles of three digeneans (P. atomon, A. balthicum, A. timmi), one acanthocephalan (Echinorhynchus gadi), and one nematode (Hysterothylacium sp.). The prevalence increased in these cycles from host level to host level and attained relatively high values in all guilds. The parasite fauna of the Salzhaff area is influenced by eutrophication stress, which leads to a high level of productivity and, consequently, to great densities in primary consumers such as snails and crustaceans. These are attractive for several secondary consumers such as fish and birds, which is the reason for the existence of at least 24 autogenic and 20 allogenic parasite species at this locality. The slight surplus of the first category indicates a yet-balanced environment in the investigation area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10836510     DOI: 10.1007/s004360050681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  11 in total

1.  Distance decay of similarity among parasite communities of three marine invertebrate hosts.

Authors:  David W Thieltges; MacNeill A D Ferguson; Cathy S Jones; Manuela Krakau; Xavier de Montaudouin; Leslie R Noble; Karsten Reise; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Analysis of a parasite supra community from the Flensburg fjord.

Authors:  Neri Josten; Kim Cornelius Detloff; C Dieter Zander
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  The colonization of the invasive round goby Neogobius melanostomus by parasites in new localities in the southwestern Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Yuriy Kvach; Helmut M Winkler
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  A revision of the genus Aphalloides (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae), parasites of European brackish water fishes.

Authors:  Yuriy Kvach; Anna Bryjová; Pierre Sasal; Helmut M Winkler
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Comparative studies on goby (Teleostei) parasite communities from the North and Baltic Sea.

Authors:  C Dieter Zander
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Redescription of Aphalloides coelomicola Dollfus, Chabaud & Golvan, 1957 (Digenea, Opisthorchioidea) based on specimens from Knipowitschia caucasica (Berg) (Actinopterygii, Gobionellidae) from a Black Sea lagoon, with comments on the systematic position of the genus.

Authors:  Borislav Stoyanov; Boyko Neov; Plamen Pankov; Georgi Radoslavov; Peter Hristov; Boyko B Georgiev
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.431

7.  Parasite diversity of sticklebacks from the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  C Dieter Zander
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Parasite communities and their ecological implications: comparative approach on three sympatric clupeiform fish populations (Actinopterygii: Clupeiformes), off Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Richard D da Silva; Luana Benicio; Juliana Moreira; Fabiano Paschoal; Felipe B Pereira
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Four-year monitoring of parasite communities in gobiid fishes of the south-western Baltic. I. Guild and component community.

Authors:  C Dieter Zander
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Four-year monitoring of parasite communities in gobiid fishes of the south-western BalticII. Infracommunity.

Authors:  C Dieter Zander
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 2.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.