Literature DB >> 10836286

The efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and paroxetine in outpatients with depressive disorder or dysthymia.

C Ballús1, G Quiros, T De Flores, J de la Torre, D Palao, L Rojo, M Gutiérrez, L Casais, Y Riesgo.   

Abstract

A 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and paroxetine in patients with major depression or dysthymia. Outpatients aged 18-70 years with a baseline score of 17 on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to venlafaxine, 37.5 mg, in the morning and evening or paroxetine, 20 mg, in the morning and placebo in the evening, which could be increased to venlafaxine, 75 mg twice daily, or paroxetine, 20 mg twice daily, after 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed with the 21-item HAM-D, the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Forty-one patients were randomized to venlafaxine and 43 to paroxetine. At week 6, a response was observed in 55% of patients on venlafaxine and 29% on paroxetine (P = 0.03). At week 12, significantly (P = 0.011) more patients in the venlafaxine group had a HAM-D remission score of 8 or less (59% versus 31%). Discontinuation for any reason occurred in 16 (39%) patients on venlafaxine and 11 (26%) on paroxetine. The most common adverse events were nausea (28%), headache (18%) and dry mouth (15%) with venlafaxine and headache (40%) and constipation (16%) with paroxetine. Venlafaxine was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate depression or dysthymia. A consistently higher proportion of patients had a response or remission on venlafaxine than on paroxetine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10836286     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200015010-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  12 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation antidepressants: do they offer advantages over the SSRIs?

Authors:  J S Olver; G D Burrows; T R Norman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Weinmann; T Becker; M Koesters
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.

Authors:  Ai Leng Khoo; Hui Jun Zhou; Monica Teng; Liang Lin; Ying Jiao Zhao; Lay Beng Soh; Yee Ming Mok; Boon Peng Lim; Kok Peng Gwee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Paternal dapoxetine administration induced deterioration in reproductive performance, fetal outcome, sexual behavior and biochemistry of male rats.

Authors:  R ElMazoudy; N AbdelHameed; A ElMasry
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  Pharmacotherapy to sustain the fully remitted state.

Authors:  Sidney Kennedy; Roger McIntyre; Angelo Fallu; Raymond Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  NMDA receptor/nitrergic system blockage augments antidepressant-like effects of paroxetine in the mouse forced swimming test.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghasemi; Laleh Montaser-Kouhsari; Hamed Shafaroodi; Behtash Ghazi Nezami; Farzad Ebrahimi; Ahmad Reza Dehpour
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of dysthymia in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Maria Nobile; Giulia M Cataldo; Cecilia Marino; Massimo Molteni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Comparative risk for harms of second-generation antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Patricia Thieda; Richard A Hansen; Bradley N Gaynes; Angela Deveaugh-Geiss; Erin E Krebs; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Puvan Tharmanathan; Hans-Peter Volz; Hans-Juergen Moeller; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Differential effects of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder according to baseline severity.

Authors:  Andreas B Schmitt; Michael Bauer; Hans-Peter Volz; Hans-Jürgen Moeller; Qin Jiang; Philip T Ninan; Peter-Andreas Loeschmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.