Literature DB >> 10836283

Increased remission rates with venlafaxine compared with fluoxetine in hospitalized patients with major depression and melancholia.

M Tzanakaki1, M Guazzelli, I Nimatoudis, N P Zissis, E Smeraldi, F Rizzo.   

Abstract

This was a 6-week, double-blind, randomized trial of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in 109 patients with major depression and melancholia. Hospitalized and day care patients with DSM-IV major depression and melancholia and a baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of > or = 25 were eligible. The doses were venlafaxine 75 mg/day or fluoxetine 20 mg/day from days 1-4, venlafaxine 150 mg/day or fluoxetine 40 mg/day from days 5-10, and venlafaxine 225 mg/day or fluoxetine 60 mg/day from days 11-42. The intention-to-treat analyses included 55 patients on venlafaxine and 54 on fluoxetine. At the final evaluation, 70% of patients with venlafaxine and 66% with fluoxetine had > or = 50% reduction in the MADRS score, and 70% with venlafaxine and 62% with fluoxetine had a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score of 1 or 2. A CGI improvement score of 1 was observed in 51% of patients with venlafaxine and 32% with fluoxetine (P = 0.018). A final Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score < 7 was attained in 41% of venlafaxine-treated and 36% of fluoxetine-treated patients. Overall, 22% of patients in each group discontinued therapy, but only 5% on venlafaxine and 9% on fluoxetine discontinued for adverse events. Nausea was reported in 5.5% of venlafaxine-treated patients and 14.8% of fluoxetine-treated patients. Venlafaxine was effective and well tolerated for treating inpatients with major depression and melancholia. Based on remission criteria (HAM-D < 7 or CGI of 1), venlafaxine was superior to fluoxetine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10836283     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200015010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  14 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation antidepressants: do they offer advantages over the SSRIs?

Authors:  J S Olver; G D Burrows; T R Norman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Weinmann; T Becker; M Koesters
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Transforming the psychiatric inpatient unit from short-term pseudo-asylum care to state-of-the-art treatment setting.

Authors:  David Feifel
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2008-09

Review 4.  Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.

Authors:  Ai Leng Khoo; Hui Jun Zhou; Monica Teng; Liang Lin; Ying Jiao Zhao; Lay Beng Soh; Yee Ming Mok; Boon Peng Lim; Kok Peng Gwee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer; Laura C Morgan; Ursula Reichenpfader; Amy Greenblatt; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Sensitive spectrofluorimetric method of analysis for venlafaxine in spiked rat plasma and formulations.

Authors:  Sheikh Shahnawaz; Zaki Siddiqui; Quaisul Hoda
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 7.  Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in the treatment of major depression in comparison with other antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Atsuo Nakagawa; Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Corrado Barbui; Andrea Cipriani; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Comparative risk for harms of second-generation antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Patricia Thieda; Richard A Hansen; Bradley N Gaynes; Angela Deveaugh-Geiss; Erin E Krebs; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Puvan Tharmanathan; Hans-Peter Volz; Hans-Juergen Moeller; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Differential effects of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder according to baseline severity.

Authors:  Andreas B Schmitt; Michael Bauer; Hans-Peter Volz; Hans-Jürgen Moeller; Qin Jiang; Philip T Ninan; Peter-Andreas Loeschmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.