Literature DB >> 10835228

Kinetic study of the conversion of different substrates to lactic acid using Lactobacillus bulgaricus.

C N Burgos-Rubio1, M R Okos, P C Wankat.   

Abstract

Lactic acid fermentation includes several reactions in association with the microorganism growth. A kinetic study was performed of the conversion of multiple substrates to lactic acid using Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Batch experiments were performed to study the effect of different substrates (lactose, glucose, and galactose) on the overall bioreaction rate. During the first hours of fermentation, glucose and galactose accumulated in the medium and the rate of hydrolysis of lactose to glucose and galactose was faster than the convesion of these substrates. Once the microorganism built the necessary enzymes for the substrate conversion to lactic acid, the conversion rate was higher for glucose than for galactose. The inoculum preparation was performed in such a way that healthy young cells were obtained. By using this inoculum, shorter fermentation times with very little lag phase were observed. The consumption patterns of the different substrates converted to lactic acid were studied to determine which substrate controls the overall reaction for lactic acid production. A mathematical model (unstructured Monod type) was developed to describe microorganism growth and lactic acid production. A good fit with a simple equation was obtained. It was found experimentally that the approximate ratio of cell to substrate was 1 to 10, the growth yield coefficient (Y(XS)) was 0.10 g cell/g substrate, the product yield (Y(PS)) was 0.90 g lactic acid/g substrate, and the alpha parameter in the Luedeking-Piret equation was 9. The Monod kinetic parameters were obtained. The saturation constant (K(S)) was 3.36 g/L, and the specific growth rate (microm ) was 1.14 l/h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10835228     DOI: 10.1021/bp000022p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  6 in total

1.  Pediocin production in milk by Pediococcus acidilactici in co-culture with Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus.

Authors:  George A Somkuti; Dennis H Steinberg
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  The sensitivity and significance analysis of parameters in the model of pH regulation on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus bulgaricus.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Xiangmiao Zeng; Lei Qiao; Xisheng Li; Yubo Yang; Cuihong Dai; Aiju Hou; Dechang Xu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Co-fermentation of the main sugar types from a beechwood organosolv hydrolysate by several strains of Bacillus coagulans results in effective lactic acid production.

Authors:  Robert Glaser; Joachim Venus
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2018-03-05

4.  Dynamic simulation of continuous mixed sugar fermentation with increasing cell retention time for lactic acid production using Enterococcus mundtii QU 25.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Ka-Lai Chan; Mohamed Ali Abdel-Rahman; Kenji Sonomoto; Shao-Yuan Leu
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Age-dependent changes of hindgut microbiota succession and metabolic function of Mongolian cattle in the semi-arid rangelands.

Authors:  Zeyi Liang; Jianbo Zhang; Mei Du; Anum Ali Ahmad; Shengyi Wang; Juanshan Zheng; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh; Ping Yan; Jianlin Han; Bin Tong; Xuezhi Ding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Lactobacillus crispatus L1: high cell density cultivation and exopolysaccharide structure characterization to highlight potentially beneficial effects against vaginal pathogens.

Authors:  Giovanna Donnarumma; Antonio Molinaro; Donatella Cimini; Cristina De Castro; Vivien Valli; Vincenza De Gregorio; Mario De Rosa; Chiara Schiraldi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.605

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.