Literature DB >> 10835135

Signal intensity artifacts in clinical MR imaging.

R W Jones1, R J Witte.   

Abstract

Signal intensity artifacts are often encountered during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Occasionally, these artifacts are severe enough to degrade image quality and interfere with interpretation. Signal intensity artifacts inherent in local coil imaging include intensity gradients and local intensity shift artifact. The latter can be minimized but not eliminated with optimal coil design and tuning. Improper coil or patient positioning can produce subtle or, in some cases, severe signal intensity artifacts, and each is easily corrected. Signal intensity artifacts and image degradation can also occur in a perfectly functioning coil if protocols are not optimized. Failure of decoupling mechanisms can produce signal intensity artifacts that will not respond to protocol optimization and will worsen with gradient imaging. Improper coil tuning manifests as a shading artifact that can mimic other findings. Signal-degrading artifacts may be caused by a ferromagnetic foreign body in the imager. Signal intensity artifacts can also result from performing ultrafast imaging with coils that were not designed for this type of imaging or from MR imaging system malfunction. Familiarity with the various causes of signal intensity artifacts is necessary to maintain optimal image quality and should be required as part of any MR imaging quality assurance program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10835135     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma19893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  Measurement of Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise in the fBIRN Multicenter Imaging Study.

Authors:  Vincent A Magnotta; Lee Friedman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Signal fluctuations induced by non-T1-related confounds in variable TR fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Shuowen Hu; Olumide Olulade; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Image quality improvement of composed whole-spine MR images by applying a modified homomorphic filter--first results in cases of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M P Lichy; C Mueller-Horvat; V Jellus; W Horger; M Horger; C Pfannenberg; B Kiefer; C D Claussen; H P Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurement of internal deformation of vibrating vocal fold models.

Authors:  Cassandra J Taylor; Grayson J Tarbox; Bradley D Bolster; Neal K Bangerter; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An edge-directed interpolation method for fetal spine MR images.

Authors:  Shaode Yu; Rui Zhang; Shibin Wu; Jiani Hu; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Efficient Blockwise Permutation Tests Preserving Exchangeability.

Authors:  Chunxiao Zhou; Chris E Zwilling; Vince D Calhoun; Michelle Y Wang
Journal:  Int J Stat Med Res       Date:  2014-04-30

7.  Left-Right Intensity Asymmetries Vary Depending on Scanner Model for FLAIR and T1 Weighted MRI Images.

Authors:  Arvin Arani; Christopher G Schwarz; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Petrice M Cogswell; Matthew C Murphy; Joshua D Trzasko; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Kiaran P McGee; Yunhong Shu; Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.119

8.  Cross-sectional area and fat content in dachshund epaxial muscles: an MRI and CT reliability study.

Authors:  Anna Fredrika Boström; Anu K Lappalainen; Lieven Danneels; Tarja S Jokinen; Outi Laitinen-Vapaavuori; Anna K Hielm-Björkman
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2018-03-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.