Literature DB >> 10834779

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with fentanyl-bupivacaine: influence of prior dural puncture.

G Beaubien1, P Drolet, M Girard, Y Grenier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) involves the epidural administration of local anesthetic and opioid solutions adjacent to the prior dural puncture, potentially increasing their diffusion into the subarachnoid space. This study was designed to evaluate the influence of dural puncture on the adequacy and extent of analgesia, and drugs requirements of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in the postoperative period.
METHODS: In this prospective double-blind study, 40 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia followed with PCEA were randomly assigned to either group I (preoperative insertion of an epidural catheter) or group II (preoperative dural puncture with a 25-g Quincke needle + insertion of an epidural catheter). Postoperatively, a PCEA pump delivered an infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine + fentanyl (3 microg/mL) at 5 mL/h. Participants were allowed to self-administer 5-mL boluses of the same solution with a 15-minute lock-out interval. Hourly epidural solution requirements were recorded for 40 hours. Sensory and motor block, and pain scores were also analyzed.
RESULTS: There was no difference between groups with regard to epidural solution requirements, pain scores, spread of sensory blockade, or intensity of motor block.
CONCLUSION: Dural puncture with a 25-gauge Quincke needle, performed as part of CSEA, does not influence the drug requirements when a combination of 0.1% bupivacaine and fentanyl (3 microg/mL) is used for PCEA after major abdominal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10834779     DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(00)90007-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  1 in total

Review 1.  Dural puncture epidural versus conventional epidural analgesia for labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Haiying Yin; Xin Tong; Han Huang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.931

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.