OBJECTIVES: To develop a predictable, dose-dependent, clinically relevant model of severe respiratory failure associated with a 40% total body surface area, full-thickness (third-degree) cutaneous flame burn and smoke inhalation injury in adult sheep. DESIGN: Model development. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Adult female sheep (n = 22). INTERVENTIONS: Animals were divided into three groups, determined by the number of smoke breaths administered (24, 36, 48) for a graded inhalation injury. The smoke was insufflated into a tracheostomy with a modified bee smoker at airway temperatures <40 degrees C. All animals concurrently received a 40% total body surface area (third-degree) cutaneous flame burn to the body (flanks). After injury, the animals were placed on volume-controlled ventilation to achieve PaO2 >60 mm Hg and PaCO2 <40 mm Hg. Arterial blood gases and ventilator settings were monitored every 6 hrs postinjury for up to 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All animals survived the induction of injury. In the 24 smoke breath/40% total body surface area burn (24/40) group, PaO2/F(IO2) never decreased below 300, and peak inspiratory pressure was consistently <14 cm H2O with normal arterial blood gases throughout the observation period. With 36 smoke breaths/40% total body surface area burn (36/40) (n = 7), all animals had PaO2/F(IO2) of <200 and peak inspiratory pressure of 26 cm H2O within 40-48 hrs, as 30% died during the study period. With 48 smoke breaths/40% total body surface area burn (48/40) (n = 12), all animals developed respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in 24-30 hrs, but none survived the experimental period. CONCLUSIONS: Development of RDS by smoke and cutaneous flame bum injury depends on smoke inhalation dose. A combination of 36 breaths of smoke and a 40% total body surface area (third-degree) cutaneous flame burn injury can induce severe RDS (PaO2/F(IO2) <200) within 40-48 hrs to allow evaluation of various treatment modalities of RDS.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a predictable, dose-dependent, clinically relevant model of severe respiratory failure associated with a 40% total body surface area, full-thickness (third-degree) cutaneous flame burn and smoke inhalation injury in adult sheep. DESIGN: Model development. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Adult female sheep (n = 22). INTERVENTIONS: Animals were divided into three groups, determined by the number of smoke breaths administered (24, 36, 48) for a graded inhalation injury. The smoke was insufflated into a tracheostomy with a modified bee smoker at airway temperatures <40 degrees C. All animals concurrently received a 40% total body surface area (third-degree) cutaneous flame burn to the body (flanks). After injury, the animals were placed on volume-controlled ventilation to achieve PaO2 >60 mm Hg and PaCO2 <40 mm Hg. Arterial blood gases and ventilator settings were monitored every 6 hrs postinjury for up to 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All animals survived the induction of injury. In the 24 smoke breath/40% total body surface area burn (24/40) group, PaO2/F(IO2) never decreased below 300, and peak inspiratory pressure was consistently <14 cm H2O with normal arterial blood gases throughout the observation period. With 36 smoke breaths/40% total body surface area burn (36/40) (n = 7), all animals had PaO2/F(IO2) of <200 and peak inspiratory pressure of 26 cm H2O within 40-48 hrs, as 30% died during the study period. With 48 smoke breaths/40% total body surface area burn (48/40) (n = 12), all animals developed respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in 24-30 hrs, but none survived the experimental period. CONCLUSIONS: Development of RDS by smoke and cutaneous flame bum injury depends on smoke inhalation dose. A combination of 36 breaths of smoke and a 40% total body surface area (third-degree) cutaneous flame burn injury can induce severe RDS (PaO2/F(IO2) <200) within 40-48 hrs to allow evaluation of various treatment modalities of RDS.
Authors: Fares Alghanem; Ryan P Davis; Benjamin S Bryner; Hayley R Hoffman; John Trahanas; Marie S Cornell; Alvaro Rojas-Peña; Robert H Bartlett; Ronald B Hirschl Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Shreyas K Roy; Daniel Kendrick; Benjamin D Sadowitz; Louis Gatto; Kathleen Snyder; Joshua M Satalin; Lorne M Golub; Gary Nieman Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2011-06-21 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Yusuke Yamamoto; Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Sebastian Rehberg; Sven Asmussen; Hiroshi Ito; Linda E Sousse; Robert A Cox; Donald J Deyo; Lillian D Traber; Maret G Traber; David N Herndon; Daniel L Traber Journal: Burns Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Frank C Schmalstieg; Susan E Keeney; Helen E Rudloff; Kimberly H Palkowetz; Manuel Cevallos; Xiaoquin Zhou; Robert A Cox; Hal K Hawkins; Daniel L Traber; Joseph B Zwischenberger Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Premila D Leiphrakpam; Hannah R Weber; Andrea McCain; Roser Romaguera Matas; Ernesto Martinez Duarte; Keely L Buesing Journal: Respir Res Date: 2021-07-07