Literature DB >> 10834650

Tightness of duraplasty in rabbits: a comparative study.

R Filippi1, A Derdilopoulos, A Heimann, F Krummenauer, A Perneczky, O Kempski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test, in rabbits, the tightness of seven dural substitution materials commonly used in neurosurgery, i.e., Lyodura (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany), Tutoplast dura (Tutogen Medical, Inc., Parsippany, NJ), Tutoplast fascia lata (Tutogen Medical, Inc.), autologous periosteum, Neuropatch (B. Braun Melsungen AG), Dacron (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE), and Ethisorb (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ).
METHODS: Duraplasties were performed with sutures alone or were additionally fixed with fibrin glue. Leakage pressures were assessed by infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid, containing sodium fluorescein, into the cisterna magna and detection of fluorescence using a charge-coupled display camera with background substraction, 3 days, 3 weeks, or 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Three days after implantation, the mean tightness values of duraplasties with Lyodura or Neuropatch were significantly higher (P = 0.007) than the values for the other substitutes. A significant improvement of tightness with increasing implantation time could be demonstrated for autologous periosteum (P = 0.0063). Improvement of tightness with the use of fibrin glue could be proven only for the heterologous grafts (P = 0.0071). The tightness values for Neuropatch fixed only with sutures were similar to those for the best heterologous substitutes implanted with additional fibrin glue. Lyodura, Tutoplast dura, and Neuropatch demonstrated favorable implantation characteristics; they were thin, flexible, and easily suturable. Neither adhesions to the brain nor space-occupying scars were noted.
CONCLUSION: These results confirm the excellent suitability of Lyodura and Neuropatch for dural substitution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10834650     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200006000-00032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  [The use of a resorbable, synthetic membrane for the elevation of the sinus floor].

Authors:  Alexander C Kübler; Jörg Neugebauer; Viktor Karapetian; Jung-Hwan Oh; Martin Scheer; Joachim E Zöller
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-05-01

2.  Medial orbital wall reconstruction with flexible Ethisorb patches.

Authors:  P Pohlenz; W Adler; L Li; R Schmelzle; J Klatt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of efficacy and biocompatibility of a novel semisynthetic collagen matrix as a dural onlay graft in a large animal model.

Authors:  Axel Neulen; Angelika Gutenberg; Ildikó Takács; György Wéber; Jürgen Wegmann; Walter Schulz-Schaeffer; Alf Giese
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Use of equine pericardium sheet (LYOMESH®) as dura mater substitute in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Luigi M Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Teresa Somma; Alberto Di Somma; Carmela Chiaramonte; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2013-09-02

5.  Fascia lata packing and tension suturing for symptomatic pseudomeningocele after recurrent cervical intradural tumour resection.

Authors:  Yangliang Huang; Yi Zhong; Huanbo Xu; Guowang Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Transcutaneous Drainage of Gel-Like Substance after Application of Hydrogel Dural Sealant: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Homayoun Siman; Fernando Techy
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-04-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.