Literature DB >> 10833707

Age dependency of sensing performance and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacing.

U K Wiegand1, J Potratz, F Bode, R Schneider, W Peters, H Bonnemeier, H A Katus.   

Abstract

Implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers is an established therapeutic option in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function. However, related to occurrence of sinus node disease and atrial undersensing, there is concern whether VDD devices are appropriate in physically active young patients. Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with isolated AV block and VDD pacemakers were investigated. This population was subdivided into quartiles of 58 patients according to age at time of inclusion: 26.2-59.4 years (group A), 59.5-70.1 years (group B), 70.2-81.0 years (group C), and 81.1-92.5 years (group D). Follow-up visits included pacemaker telemetry, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing. Patients were visited at 2 and 12 weeks after implantation thereafter followed by 6-month intervals. Mean follow-up period was 35 +/- 14 months. Three months after implantation, atrial sensing threshold was significantly higher in young patients: 1.18 +/- 0.58 mV (group A) versus 0.79 +/- 0.35 mV (group B), 0.68 +/- 0.33 mV (group C), and 0.60 +/- 0.25 mV (group D), P < 0.001 for comparison of group A to all other groups. Atrial undersensing was observed less frequently in young patients: 6.9% (group A) versus 17.2% (group B), 24.1% (group C), and 27.6% (group D), P = 0.025 for intergroup comparisons. Sinus node dysfunction did not occur in group A. Atrial arrhythmias and loss of AV synchronized pacing mode occurred rarely in young patients: 0.6% (0.4%) per year in group A versus 1.3% (1.3%) in group B, 3.9% (3.4%) in group C, and 5.7% (7.4%) per year in group D, P < 0.01 for intergroup comparisons. Our data show good atrial sensing performance, low incidence of sinus node dysfunction, and few atrial arrhythmias in young patients with VDD pacing for AV block. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended particularly for young patients with AV block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10833707     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00856.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

1.  Atrial near-field and ventricular far-field analysis by automated signal processing at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Martin Lipphardt; Ulrich G Hofmann; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Long term complications in single and dual chamber pacing are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity.

Authors:  F Eberhardt; F Bode; H Bonnemeier; F Boguschewski; M Schlei; W Peters; U K H Wiegand
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Intracardiac atrial signal amplitude in congenital and acquired complete heart block.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Samiei Nasab; Mohammad Reza Dehghani; Mehrdad Taherioun; Alireza Rostamzadeh
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-10-31

4.  Long-term outcome in patients receiving permanent pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block: Comparison of VDD and DDD pacing.

Authors:  Jo-Nan Liao; Tze-Fan Chao; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Chi-Woon Kong; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.