Literature DB >> 10833699

Regional differences in arrhythmogenic aftereffects of high intensity DC stimulation in the ventricles.

I Kodama1, I Sakuma, N Shibata, S B Knisley, R Niwa, H Honjo.   

Abstract

Regional differences of the aftereffects of high intensity DC stimulation were investigated in isolated rabbit hearts stained with a voltage-sensitive dye (di-4-ANEPPS). Optical action potential signals were recorded from the epicardial surface of the right and left ventricular free wall (RVep, LVep) and from the right endocardial surface of the interventricular septum (IVS). Ten-millisecond monophasic DC stimulation (S2, 20-120 V) was applied to the signal recording spots during the early plateau phase of the action potential induced by basic stimuli (S1, 2.5 Hz). There was a linear relationship between S2 voltage and the S2 field intensity (FI). S2 caused postshock additional depolarization, giving rise to a prolongation of the shocked action potential. With S2 > or = 40 V (FI > or = approximately 20 V/cm), terminal repolarization of action potential was inhibited, and subsequent postshock S1 action potentials for 1-5 minutes were characterized by a decrease in the maximum diastolic potential and a decrease in the amplitude and a slowing of their upstroke phase. The higher the S2 voltage, the larger the aftereffects. The changes in postshock action potential configuration in RVep were significantly greater than those observed in LVep and IVS when compared at the same levels of S2 intensity. In RVep, 12 of 20 shocks of 120 V resulted in a prolonged refractoriness to S1 (> 1 s), and the arrest was often followed by oscillation of membrane potential. Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation ensued from the oscillation in five cases. No such long arrest or serious arrhythmias were elicited in LVep and IVS. These results suggest that RVep is more susceptible than LVep and IVS for arrhythmogenic aftereffects of high intensity DC stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10833699     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  The potential of dual camera systems for multimodal imaging of cardiac electrophysiology and metabolism.

Authors:  Mark R Holcomb; Marcella C Woods; Ilija Uzelac; John P Wikswo; Jonathan M Gilligan; Veniamin Y Sidorov
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2009-08-05

3.  A fiber-based ratiometric optical cardiac mapping channel using a diffraction grating and split detector.

Authors:  Ninita H Brown; Hana M Dobrovolny; Daniel J Gauthier; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Sergey Grigoryev; Johanna U Neuber; Christian W Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Open-Source Multiparametric Optocardiography.

Authors:  Brianna Cathey; Sofian Obaid; Alexander M Zolotarev; Roman A Pryamonosov; Roman A Syunyaev; Sharon A George; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.