Literature DB >> 10833199

How important is DNA replication for mutagenesis?

G A Huttley1, I B Jakobsen, S R Wilson, S Easteal.   

Abstract

Rates of mutation and substitution in mammals are generally greater in the germ lines of males. This is usually explained as resulting from the larger number of germ cell divisions during spermatogenesis compared with oogenesis, with the assumption made that mutations occur primarily during DNA replication. However, the rate of cell division is not the only difference between male and female germ lines, and mechanisms are known that can give rise to mutations independently of DNA replication. We investigate the possibility that there are other causes of male-biased mutation. First, we show that patterns of variation at approximately 5,200 short tandem repeat (STR) loci indicate a higher mutation rate in males. We estimate a ratio of male-to-female mutation rates of approximately 1.9. This is significantly greater than 1 and supports a greater rate of mutation in males, affecting the evolution of these loci. Second, we show that there are chromosome-specific patterns of nucleotide and dinucleotide composition in mammals that have been shaped by mutation at CpG dinucleotides. Comparable patterns occur in birds. In mammals, male germ lines are more methylated than female germ lines, and these patterns indicate that differential methylation has played a role in male-biased vertebrate evolution. However, estimates of male mutation bias obtained from both classes of mutation are substantially lower than estimates of cell division bias from anatomical data. This discrepancy, along with published data indicating slipped-strand mispairing arising at STR loci in nonreplicating DNA, suggests that a substantial percentage of mutation may occur in nonreplicating DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10833199     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  16 in total

1.  Male-biased transmission of deleterious mutations to the progeny in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Carrie-Ann Whittle; Mark O Johnston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution.

Authors:  Yogeshwar D Kelkar; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  SNPSTR rs59186128_D7S820 polymorphism distribution in European Caucasoid, Hispanic, and Afro-American populations.

Authors:  A Odriozola; J M Aznar; L Valverde; S Cardoso; M L Bravo; J J Builes; B Martínez; D Sanchez; F González-Andrade; E Sarasola; M C González-Fernández; B Martínez Jarreta; Marian M De Pancorbo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Statistical Methods for Identifying Sequence Motifs Affecting Point Mutations.

Authors:  Yicheng Zhu; Teresa Neeman; Von Bing Yap; Gavin A Huttley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mutations within a furin consensus sequence block proteolytic release of ectodysplasin-A and cause X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.

Authors:  Y Chen; S S Molloy; L Thomas; J Gambee; H P Bächinger; B Ferguson; J Zonana; G Thomas; N P Morris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mutation rates in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Sankar Subramanian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Measurement of mutational flow implies both a high new-mutation rate for Huntington disease and substantial underascertainment of late-onset cases.

Authors:  D Falush; E W Almqvist; R R Brinkmann; Y Iwasa; M R Hayden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Breaking bad: The mutagenic effect of DNA repair.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-05-01

10.  Evidence that replication-associated mutation alone does not explain between-chromosome differences in substitution rates.

Authors:  Catherine J Pink; Siva K Swaminathan; Ian Dunham; Jane Rogers; Andrew Ward; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.