Literature DB >> 1083223

The right to know: giving the patient his medical record.

A Golodetz, J Ruess, R L Milhous.   

Abstract

Each patient admitted to the 16-bed Rehabilitation Medicine Service at Medical Center Hospital of Vermont since October 1972 has received a carbon copy of his full Admission and Discharge notes, containing the complete problem list, and for each problem the relevant data, the Assessment and the Plans. The objectives were to improve patient education; to improve the patient's chances to contribute to the planning of his care; and to increase the staff's accountability to the patient. Over a period of seven months, we evaluated the effect of this maneuver for 125 consecutive patients by means of (1) a report on the patient's reactions, completed by a nurse after she reviewed the record with the patient; (2) a report by the physician stating whether he had expurgated the record for patient use, and recording his observations of patient and family reaction; (3) a questionnaire mailed to patients after discharge. Results indicated that patients were generally comfortable about reading the record, found it educational and appreciated the trust implied. No substantial difficulties arose. Few records were expurgated. The staff has accepted this style as crucial to an appropriate sharing of responsibility between themselves and the patients. We conclude that giving the patient his record is a safe and inexpensive aid to the rehabilitation process, and is probably mandated by the changing relationships between professionals and their clients, and by the patient's need to negotiate his own health care in an increasingly complex and mobile society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1083223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  14 in total

1.  Consultants' communications with general practitioners.

Authors:  B Fisher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-04

2.  Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Rebecca Preib; Kai Zheng; Sung W Choi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Trusting patients with case notes.

Authors:  D Elbourne; A Lovell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-30

4.  Family physicians' perspectives on personal health records: qualitative study.

Authors:  Gary L Yau; Andrew S Williams; Judith Belle Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  No change in physician dictation patterns when visit notes are made available online for patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kind; Jinnet B Fowles; Cheryl E Craft; Allan C Kind; Sara A Richter
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  A randomized controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice.

Authors:  C J Watkins; A O Papacosta; S Chinn; J Martin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-12

9.  Patient retained records--the health identity card.

Authors:  L W Skiba
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-02

10.  Beyond readability: investigating coherence of clinical text for consumers.

Authors:  Catherine Arnott Smith; Scott Hetzel; Prudence Dalrymple; Alla Keselman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.