Literature DB >> 10832222

Interpretation of diagnostic tests.

R H Fletcher1.   

Abstract

Clinicians can now base clinical decisions on the results of rigorous studies of the performance of diagnostic tests. In selecting the tests, clinicians should take into account their sensitivity (the proportion of patients with the disease who have a positive test result) and specificity (the proportion of patients without disease who have a negative test results). Sensitivity and specificity are affected by the "spectrum" of patients studied i.e. the severity of disease in those with disease and the clinical characteristics of those without disease. Test results are interpreted by predictive values--the proportion of patients with a positive (negative) test result who have (do not have) the disease. Predictive values depend on both test sensitivity and specificity and disease prevalence. The information content of a test is further increased by taking into account where the cut-off point between normal and abnormal is placed, the degree of abnormality of the result, and the results of the preceding tests (done either in parallel or in series). Describing test performance in terms of likelihood ratios facilitates this process. Readers should be able to critique published studies of diagnostic tests which are still far from perfect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10832222     DOI: 10.1007/bf02802642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  9 in total

1.  Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  On some clinically useful measures of the accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D L Sackett; S Straus
Journal:  ACP J Club       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Confidence in diagnostic testing.

Authors:  P S Heckerling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.

Authors:  M C Reid; M S Lachs; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.

Authors:  P F Griner; R J Mayewski; A I Mushlin; P Greenland
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  R H Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.