Literature DB >> 10831925

Monitoring individual response to hormone replacement therapy with bone markers.

P D Delmas1, P Hardy, P Garnero, M Dain.   

Abstract

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) induces a rapid decrease in biochemical markers of bone turnover that correlate with a subsequent increase in bone mineral density (BMD). To determine the utility of bone markers in the management of postmenopausal women receiving HRT, we analyzed the relationship between changes in four markers (serum osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase [BAP], serum and urinary C-telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX]) and changes in spine BMD in 569 women treated for 2 years with different doses of a matrix transdermal 17beta-estradiol patch in two placebo-controlled trials. Using a logistic regression model, we found that both the percent change from baseline and the actual value of resorption markers at 3 and 6 months of treatment were predictive of BMD response at 2 years. Comparable results were obtained with formation markers at 6 months only. We determined the sensitivity, probably of positive BMD response, and corresponding cutoff value of markers at 3 and 6 months with a specificity set at a level of 0.90, so that <10% of women classified with markers as responders, i.e., as having a subsequent increase in BMD at 2 years >/=2.26%, would be false positive. All markers provided a high probability of positive BMD response ranging from 0.82 to 0.91, with a sensitivity higher for resorption than for formation markers, and sometimes improved in a model combining the percent change and the actual value of marker under HRT. For example, a decrease in serum CTX >/= 33% at 3 months of HRT provided a 68% sensitivity and 87% probability of positive BMD response at 2 years for a 90% specificity. At 6 months, a decrease in urinary CTX >/= 53% provided a 68% sensitivity and 91% probability of a positive BMD response for a 90% specificity. Half of false-negative cases at 3 months will be correctly identified by a subsequent urinary CTX measurement at 6 months. We conclude that the short-term change in bone markers reflects long-term changes of BMD in postmenopausal women treated with HRT. Our data suggest that bone turnover markers can be used to monitor the BMD response to HRT at the individual level. Whether such monitoring could improve long-term compliance to HRT should be tested prospectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831925     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00271-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical utility of bone markers in the evaluation and follow-up of osteoporotic patients: why are the markers poorly accepted by clinicians?

Authors:  J J Stepan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Effects of high-intensity resistance training and low-intensity resistance training with vascular restriction on bone markers in older men.

Authors:  Murat Karabulut; Debra A Bemben; Vanessa D Sherk; Mark A Anderson; Takashi Abe; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Bone response to treatment with lower doses of conjugated estrogens with and without medroxyprogesterone acetate in early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Robert Lindsay; J Christopher Gallagher; Michael Kleerekoper; James H Pickar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Cathepsin K in treatment monitoring following intravenous zoledronic acid.

Authors:  Oliver Jahn; Thomas Wex; Silke Klose; Siegfried Kropf; Daniela Adolf; Stefan Piatek
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2014-09-10

6.  Reference database of biochemical markers of bone turnover for the Japanese female population. Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  Masayuki Iki; Takashi Akiba; Toshio Matsumoto; Harumi Nishino; Sadanobu Kagamimori; Yoshiko Kagawa; Hideo Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-31       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone turnover and body weight relationships differ in normal-weight compared with heavier postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Cifuentes; M A Johnson; R D Lewis; S B Heymsfield; H A Chowdhury; C M Modlesky; S A Shapses
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prediction of changes in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women treated with once-weekly bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Kenneth Saag; Anthony Sebba; Anne E de Papp; Erluo Chen; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Correlation of bone mineral density with biochemical markers in post menopausal women.

Authors:  S Agrawal; Anju Jain; D Mahajan; C Raghunandan
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-09-16

Review 10.  Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Serge C L M Cremers; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.