Literature DB >> 10831691

Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging--a multicenter phase III clinical study.

J Petersein1, A Spinazzi, A Giovagnoni, P Soyer, F Terrier, R Lencioni, C Bartolozzi, L Grazioli, A Chiesa, R Manfredi, P Marano, E L Van Persijn Van Meerten, J L Bloem, C Petre, G Marchal, A Greco, M T McNamara, A Heuck, M Reiser, M Laniado, C Claussen, H E Daldrup, E Rummeny, M A Kirchin, G Pirovano, B Hamm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for dynamic and delayed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of focal liver lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 126 of 214 patients, MR imaging was performed before Gd-BOPTA administration, immediately after bolus administration of a 0.05- mmol/kg dose of Gd-BOPTA, and 60-120 minutes after an additional intravenously infused 0.05-mmol/kg dose. In 88 patients, imaging was performed before and 60-120 minutes after a single, intravenously infused 0.1-mmol/kg dose. T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo and T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired. On-site and blinded off-site reviewers prospectively evaluated all images. Intraoperative ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography, and/or CT with iodized oil served as the reference methods in 110 patients.
RESULTS: Significantly more lesions were detected on combined pre- and postcontrast images compared with on precontrast images alone (P <. 01). All reviewers reported a decreased mean size of the smallest detected lesion and improved lesion conspicuity on postcontrast images. All on-site reviewers and two off-site reviewers reported increased overall diagnostic confidence (P <.01). Additional lesion characterization information was provided on up to 109 (59%) of 184 delayed images and for up to 50 (42%) of 118 patients in whom dynamic images were assessed. Gd-BOPTA would have helped change the diagnosis in 99 (47%) of 209 cases and affected patient treatment in 408 (23%) of 209 cases.
CONCLUSION: Gd-BOPTA increases liver lesion conspicuity and detectability and aids in the characterization of lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831691     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn14727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  38 in total

Review 1.  What is the current situation in liver imaging?

Authors:  M M Uggowitzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA].

Authors:  C Stroszczynski; G Gaffke; M Gnauck; F Streitparth; G Wieners; E Lopez-Häninnen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Malignant focal liver lesions at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance with hepatospecific contrast agent.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; S Crosara; R De Robertis; S Canestrini; V Cantisani; G Morana; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  Effect of hepatobiliary uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatic venous phase of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging on a 3.0-T apparatus: comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  Yasunari Fujinaga; Ayumi Ohya; Tsuyoshi Matsushita; Masahiro Kurozumi; Kazuhiko Ueda; Yoshihiro Kitou; Hitoshi Ueda; Masumi Kadoya
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  Safety of MR liver specific contrast media.

Authors:  Marie-France Bellin; Judith A W Webb; Aart J Van Der Molen; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Optimized high-resolution contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary imaging at 3 tesla: a cross-over comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Scott K Nagle; Sharon L D'Souza; Karl K Vigen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus baseline ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in metastatic disease of the liver: diagnostic performance and confidence.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia; Mirko D'Onofrio; Alessandro Palumbo; Stefania Rossi; Stefano Bruni; Maria Cova
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Improved characterization of focal liver lesions with liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  Steven S Raman; Christopher Leary; David A Bluemke; Marco Amendola; Dushyant Sahani; Jeffrey D McTavish; Jeffrey Brody; Eric Outwater; Donald Mitchell; Douglas H Sheafor; Jeff Fidler; Isaac R Francis; Richard C Semelka; Kohkan Shamsi; Simone Gschwend; David R Feldman; Josy Breuer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Detection of malignant primary hepatic neoplasms with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) enhanced T1-weighted hepatocyte phase MR imaging: results of off-site blinded review in a phase-II multicenter trial.

Authors:  C S Peña; S Saini; R L Baron; B A Hamm; G Morana; R Caudana; A Giovagnoni; A Villa; A Carriero; D Mathieu; M W Bourne; M A Kirchin; G Pirovano; A Spinazzi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Daniel Stocker; Stefanie Hectors; Octavia Bane; Naik Vietti-Violi; Daniela Said; Paul Kennedy; Jordan Cuevas; Guilherme M Cunha; Claude B Sirlin; Kathryn J Fowler; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.