Literature DB >> 10831546

Recombinant human FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH: a randomized study in intrauterine insemination with husbands' spermatozoa.

R Matorras1, V Recio, B Corcóstegui, F J Rodríguez-Escudero.   

Abstract

A randomized trial was carried out comparing recombinant FSH (rFSH) and highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) with husbands' spermatozoa. A total of 45 women received rFSH (139 cycles), while 46 women received uFSH (155 cycles). The starting dose was 150 IU/day s.c., beginning on the second day, and on days 6-7 the dose was adjusted according to ovarian response, assessed by vaginal ultrasound and plasma oestradiol concentration. The pregnancy rate according to the intention to treat was 57.8% in rFSH versus 52.2% in uFSH, the corrected pregnancy rates 56.8% and 52.2%, and the cumulative pregnancy rates 69.6% and 61.0%, but the differences were not statistically significant. The per cycle pregnancy rate was 18.12% in rFSH and 15.48% in u-FSH, also not statistically significant. In the rFSH group, the consumption of FSH ampoules per cycle was significantly lower (19.20 +/- 7.02 versus 23. 80 +/- 10.78; P < 0.0001). The ratio of oestradiol/FSH ampoules was significantly higher in rFSH (56.45 +/- 31.26 versus 46.41 +/- 29. 25; P < 0.001). These data indicate that, in IUI cycles, rFSH has a higher potency than uFSH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831546     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.6.1231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  Reflections on the cost-effectiveness of recombinant FSH in assisted reproduction. The clinician's perspective.

Authors:  J Balasch; P N Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility.

Authors:  Astrid Ep Cantineau; Anouk Gh Rutten; Ben J Cohlen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-05

3.  Physical activity and sperm quality: influence in sperm donors.

Authors:  Roberto Matorras; Alfredo Navarro; Dagoberto Ramos; Iker Malaina; Jon Irazusta; Alberto Vendrell; Amaia Fernandez; Marcos Ferrando; Fernando Quintana
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Gn-RH antagonists in intrauterine insemination: the weekend-free protocol.

Authors:  Roberto Matorras; Olga Ramón; Antonia Expósito; Beatriz Corcóstegui; Iratxe Ocerin; Sandra Gonzalez-Lopera; Francisco J Rodríguez-Escudero
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Recombinant versus highly-purified, urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH) in ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized study with cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Francesca Poso; Gianluca Gennarelli; Federica Moffa; Giuseppina Grassi; Marco Massobrio
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Pregnancy predictors after intrauterine insemination: analysis of 3012 cycles in 1201 couples.

Authors:  Macizo Soria; Gálvez Pradillo; Jorquera García; Peinado Ramón; Alvarez Castillo; Canteras Jordana; Parrilla Paricio
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-07

7.  The İmpact of Gonadotropin Type on Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and İntrauterine İnsemination Cycle Outcomes.

Authors:  Ozge Senem Yucel Cicek; Merve Demir
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 8.  Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Rosalie Cabry-Goubet; Florence Scheffler; Naima Belhadri-Mansouri; Stephanie Belloc; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Aviva Devaux; Hickmat Chahine; Jacques De Mouzon; Henri Copin; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.