BACKGROUND: A high restenosis rate has been reported at the edges ("edge restenosis") of (32)P radioactive stents with an initial activity level of 3 to 12 microCi. This edge effect might be due to balloon injury and to a low dose of radiation at the stent margins. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the implantation of (32)P radioactive stents with a higher activity level (12 to 21 microCi) combined with a nonaggressive stent implantation strategy could solve the problem of edge restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the results of lesions treated with single radioactive BX stents with an activity of 12 to 21 microCi (group 2, n = 54 lesions) with the results of lesions treated by single radioactive BX stents with an initial activity level of 3 to 12 microCi (group 1, n = 42 lesions). There were no procedural events. At the 6-month follow-up, no myocardial infarctions, deaths, or stent thromboses had occurred. Intrastent binary restenosis was 0% in group 1 versus 4% in group 2 (n = 2, both at the ostium of the right coronary artery, P = NS). Intrastent neointimal hyperplasia was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. The intralesion (intrastent plus peri-stent) restenosis rate was 38% in group 1 versus 30% in group 2 (P = NS). Conclusions-Single (32)P radioactive stents with an initial activity level of 12 to 21 microCi reduced intrastent neointimal hyperplasia compared with stents of 3 to 12 microCi, but they did not solve the problem of edge restenosis, even if a nonaggressive stent implantation strategy was used.
BACKGROUND: A high restenosis rate has been reported at the edges ("edge restenosis") of (32)P radioactive stents with an initial activity level of 3 to 12 microCi. This edge effect might be due to balloon injury and to a low dose of radiation at the stent margins. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the implantation of (32)P radioactive stents with a higher activity level (12 to 21 microCi) combined with a nonaggressive stent implantation strategy could solve the problem of edge restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the results of lesions treated with single radioactive BX stents with an activity of 12 to 21 microCi (group 2, n = 54 lesions) with the results of lesions treated by single radioactive BX stents with an initial activity level of 3 to 12 microCi (group 1, n = 42 lesions). There were no procedural events. At the 6-month follow-up, no myocardial infarctions, deaths, or stent thromboses had occurred. Intrastent binary restenosis was 0% in group 1 versus 4% in group 2 (n = 2, both at the ostium of the right coronary artery, P = NS). Intrastent neointimal hyperplasia was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. The intralesion (intrastent plus peri-stent) restenosis rate was 38% in group 1 versus 30% in group 2 (P = NS). Conclusions-Single (32)P radioactive stents with an initial activity level of 12 to 21 microCi reduced intrastent neointimal hyperplasia compared with stents of 3 to 12 microCi, but they did not solve the problem of edge restenosis, even if a nonaggressive stent implantation strategy was used.
Authors: Karsten Krueger; Mark Bendel; Markus Zaehringer; David Strohe; Christopher Bangard; Carsten Weise; Rolf-Peter Mueller; Klaus Lackner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 5.315