Literature DB >> 10831349

Detection of micrometastasis by cytokeratin-20 (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) in lymph nodes of patients with endometrial cancer.

A Fishman1, A Klein, R Zemer, S Zimlichman, J Bernheim, I Cohen, M M Altaras.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytokeratins are constituents of the intermediate filaments (IFs) of epithelial cells which are expressed in various combinations, depending on the type of epithelium and degree of differentiation. We have reported (R. Zemer, A. Fishman, J. Bernheim, S. Zimlichman, O. Markowitz, M. Altaras, and A. Klein, Gynecol Oncol 70:410-413, 1998) on the determination of cytokeratin-20 (CK-20) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the detection of endometrial cancer cells as a potential biomarker. In that study, we also found that by using immunocytochemistry, most carcinomas were found to be negative for CK-20. The sensitivity and specificity rates obtained by using the RT-PCR method were 94.4 and 91%, respectively.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and potential of the specific mRNA marker, CK-20, to detect endometrial cancer cells-micrometastases (MMs)-by RT-PCR in lymph node (LN) samplings of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
METHOD: We used the RT-PCR method to determine the expression of CK-20 in the LNs of 20 patients [study group (SG)] who were being surgically staged and treated for endometrial carcinoma. The specificity of the mRNA CK-20 marker was examined in LNs obtained from five healthy patients [control group (CG)] who underwent abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy for benign gynecologic conditions. The LNs obtained from the SG and CG patients were prepared together before mRNA extraction. RNA of the various cell pellets was extracted and RT-PCR was performed with CK-20 primers. RT-PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining against PCR size markers. Specificity of the RT-PCR products was examined by Southern blotting.
RESULTS: Histopathologic examinations demonstrated the presence of metastases in two (10%) SG patients. These patients were also CK-20 positive. Of the remaining 18 patients with negative histopathologic results, 6 (33%) were CK-20 positive and 12 (67%) were negative. All the CG patients were CK-20 negative (specificity, 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study suggest that RT-PCR of CK-20 is more sensitive than traditional histopathologic methods in the diagnosis of MMs in LNs of patients with endometrial cancer. Thus, due to the aforementioned characteristics of CK-20, it may be considered a powerful biomarker in the detection of MMs in LNs of patients with endometrial cancer. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831349     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Orthotopic transplantation model of human gastrointestinal cancer and detection of micrometastases.

Authors:  J H Cui; U Krueger; D Henne-Bruns; B Kremer; H Kalthoff
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Accuracy of One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification in Detecting Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Angela Santoro; Italia Esposito; Giuseppe Angelico; Saveria Spadola; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 3.  [Recommendations for the handling and oncologic pathology report of lymph node specimens submitted for evaluation of metastatic disease in gynecologic malignancies].

Authors:  L-C Horn; J Einenkel; M Höckel; H Kölbl; F Kommoss; S F Lax; L Riethdorf; H-G Schnürch; D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer staging.

Authors:  Christine H Kim; Robert A Soslow; Kay J Park; Emma L Barber; Fady Khoury-Collado; Joyce N Barlin; Yukio Sonoda; Martee L Hensley; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 5.  Cytokeratin Expression Pattern in Human Endometrial Carcinomas and Lymph Nodes Micrometastasis: a Mini-review.

Authors:  Danuta Vasilevska; Vilius Rudaitis; Aneta Adamiak-Godlewska; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Dorota Lewkowicz; Dominika Vasilevska; Andrzej Semczuk
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  Ultrastaging of lymph node in uterine cancers.

Authors:  Corinne Bézu; Charles Coutant; Marcos Ballester; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Roman Rouzier; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-21

7.  Comparative assessment of lymph node micrometastasis in cervical, endometrial and vulvar cancer: insights on the real time qRT-PCR approach versus immunohistochemistry, employing dual molecular markers.

Authors:  Kalliopi I Pappa; Alexandros Rodolakis; Ioanna Christodoulou; Maria Gazouli; Sofia Markaki; Aris Antsaklis; Nicholas P Anagnou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.