Literature DB >> 10829770

Micromachined ultrasound transducers with improved coupling factors from a CMOS compatible process

.   

Abstract

For medical high frequency acoustic imaging purposes the reduction in size of a single transducer element for one-dimensional and even more for two-dimensional arrays is more and more limited by fabrication and cabling technology. In the fields of industrial distance measurement and simple object recognition low cost phased arrays are lacking. Both problems can be solved with micromachined ultrasound transducers (MUTs). A single transducer is made of a large number of microscopic elements. Because of the array structure of these transducers, groups of elements can be built up and used as a phased array. By integrating parts of the sensor electronics on chip, the cabling effort for arrays can be reduced markedly. In contrast to standard ultrasonic technology, which is based on massive thickness resonators, vibrating membranes are the radiating elements of the MUTs. New micromachining technologies have emerged, allowing a highly reproducible fabrication of electrostatically driven membranes with gap heights below 500 nm. A microelectronic BiCMOS process was extended for surface micromechanics (T. Scheiter et al., Proceedings 11th European Conference on Solid-State Transducers, Warsaw, Vol. 3, 1997, pp. 1595-1598). Additional process steps were included for the realization of the membranes which form sealed cavities with the underlying substrate. Membrane and substrate are the opposite electrodes of a capacitive transducer. The transducers can be integrated monolithically on one chip together with the driving, preamplifying and multiplexing circuitry, thus reducing parasitic capacities and noise level significantly. Owing to their low mass the transducers are very well matched to fluid loads, resulting in a very high bandwidth of 50-100% (C. Eccardt et al., Proceedings Ultrasonics Symposium, San Antonio, Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 959-962; P.C. Eccardt et al., Proceedings of the 1997 Ultrasonics Symposium, Toronto, Vol. 2, 1997, pp. 1609-1618). In the following it is shown how the BiCMOS process has been modified to meet the demands for ultrasound generation and reception. Bias and driving voltages have been reduced down to the 10 V range. The electromechanical coupling is now almost comparable with that for piezoelectric transducers. The measurements exhibit sound pressures and bandwidths that are at least comparable with those of conventional piezoelectric transducer arrays.

Year:  2000        PMID: 10829770     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(99)00085-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

1.  Efficient Broadband Simulation of Fluid-Structure Coupling for Membrane-Type Acoustic Transducer Arrays Using the Multilevel Fast Multipole Algorithm.

Authors:  Bernard Shieh; Karim G Sabra; F Levent Degertekin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Highly Integrated Guidewire Ultrasound Imaging System-on-a-Chip.

Authors:  Jaemyung Lim; Coskun Tekes; Evren F Arkan; Ahmad Rezvanitabar; F Levent Degertekin; Maysam Ghovanloo
Journal:  IEEE J Solid-State Circuits       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.013

3.  Monolithic CMUT-on-CMOS integration for intravascular ultrasound applications.

Authors:  Jaime Zahorian; Michael Hochman; Toby Xu; Sarp Satir; Gokce Gurun; Mustafa Karaman; F Levent Degertekin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for therapeutic ultrasound applications.

Authors:  Serena H Wong; Mario Kupnik; Ronald D Watkins; Kim Butts-Pauly; Butrus T Pierre Khuri-Yakub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers using commercial multi-user MUMPs process: capability and limitations.

Authors:  Jessica Liu; Clyde Oakley; Robin Shandas
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Forward-looking intracardiac ultrasound imaging using a 1-D CMUT array integrated with custom front-end electronics.

Authors:  Amin Nikoozadeh; Ira O Wygant; Der-Song Lin; Omer Oralkan; A Sanli Ergun; Douglas N Stephens; Kai E Thomenius; Aaron M Dentinger; Douglas Wildes; Gina Akopyan; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Aman Mahajan; David J Sahn; Butrus T Khuri-Yakub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 7.  Piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer (PMUT) arrays for integrated sensing, actuation and imaging.

Authors:  Yongqiang Qiu; James V Gigliotti; Margeaux Wallace; Flavio Griggio; Christine E M Demore; Sandy Cochran; Susan Trolier-McKinstry
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Design and Fabrication of Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer (pMUT) with Partially-Etched ZnO Film.

Authors:  Junhong Li; Wei Ren; Guoxiang Fan; Chenghao Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Recent Progress on Photoacoustic Imaging Enhanced with Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Technologies.

Authors:  Changho Lee; Jin Young Kim; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Transducers for Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging.

Authors:  Chang Peng; Huaiyu Wu; Seungsoo Kim; Xuming Dai; Xiaoning Jiang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.847

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.