Literature DB >> 10829375

Telemedicine and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the value of video-link and telephone instruction to a mock bystander.

P R Atkinson1, J Bingham, B P McNicholl, M A Loane, R Wootton.   

Abstract

We evaluated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by persons with no previous experience on a resuscitation dummy. Subjects were randomized into four groups, one of which had no instruction. The other three groups were instructed for 3 min in mock CPR by a supervisor using a telephone, a video-link, or directly in person. They were compared with a group which had had previous CPR training. The main outcome measures were the number of correct ventilations, chest compressions and compressions with correct hand position. Video-link instruction was associated with significantly higher median scores for all three outcome measurements (P < 0.05), whereas telephone instruction and previous CPR training were associated with higher scores on only one, namely ventilations (P < 0.05). Video-link instruction was comparable with direct observer instruction. There was no significant difference between previously trained subjects and the intervention groups. Video-link instruction can produce significant improvements in the quality of CPR in mock resuscitations for persons with no resuscitation training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10829375     DOI: 10.1258/1357633991933783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  5 in total

1.  2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group.

Authors:  Myra H Wyckoff; Eunice M Singletary; Jasmeet Soar; Theresa M Olasveengen; Robert Greif; Helen G Liley; David Zideman; Farhan Bhanji; Lars W Andersen; Suzanne R Avis; Khalid Aziz; Jason C Bendall; David C Berry; Vere Borra; Bernd W Böttiger; Richard Bradley; Janet E Bray; Jan Breckwoldt; Jestin N Carlson; Pascal Cassan; Maaret Castrén; Wei-Tien Chang; Nathan P Charlton; Adam Cheng; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Daniela T Costa-Nobre; Keith Couper; Katie N Dainty; Peter G Davis; Maria Fernanda de Almeida; Allan R de Caen; Edison F de Paiva; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Matthew J Douma; Ian R Drennan; Jonathan P Duff; Kathryn J Eastwood; Walid El-Naggar; Jonathan L Epstein; Raffo Escalante; Jorge G Fabres; Joe Fawke; Judith C Finn; Elizabeth E Foglia; Fredrik Folke; Karoline Freeman; Elaine Gilfoyle; Craig A Goolsby; Amy Grove; Ruth Guinsburg; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Mary Fran Hazinski; George S Heriot; Karen G Hirsch; Mathias J Holmberg; Shigeharu Hosono; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Kevin K C Hung; Cindy H Hsu; Takanari Ikeyama; Tetsuya Isayama; Vishal S Kapadia; Mandira Daripa Kawakami; Han-Suk Kim; David A Kloeck; Peter J Kudenchuk; Anthony T Lagina; Kasper G Lauridsen; Eric J Lavonas; Andrew S Lockey; Carolina Malta Hansen; David Markenson; Tasuku Matsuyama; Christopher J D McKinlay; Amin Mehrabian; Raina M Merchant; Daniel Meyran; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Kevin J Nation; Michael Nemeth; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Susan Niermeyer; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Chika Nishiyama; Brian J O'Neil; Aaron M Orkin; Osokogu Osemeke; Michael J Parr; Catherine Patocka; Jeffrey L Pellegrino; Gavin D Perkins; Jeffrey M Perlman; Yacov Rabi; Joshua C Reynolds; Giuseppe Ristagno; Charles C Roehr; Tetsuya Sakamoto; Claudio Sandroni; Taylor Sawyer; Georg M Schmölzer; Sebastian Schnaubelt; Federico Semeraro; Markus B Skrifvars; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Roger F Soll; Takahiro Sugiura; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Daniele Trevisanuto; Christian Vaillancourt; Tzong-Luen Wang; Gary M Weiner; Michelle Welsford; Jane Wigginton; Jonathan P Wyllie; Joyce Yeung; Jerry P Nolan; Katherine M Berg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Interventions to improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Chen; Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Wen-Chu Chiang; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A randomised controlled comparison of video versus instructor-based compression only life support training.

Authors:  Shahna Ali; Manazir Athar; Syed Moied Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-03

4.  A survey of factors associated with the successful recognition of agonal breathing and cardiac arrest by 9-1-1 call takers: design and methodology.

Authors:  Christian Vaillancourt; Jan L Jensen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Jamie C Brehaut; Manya Charette; Ann Kasaboski; Martin Osmond; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-07-31

5.  The effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianting Song; Wenxiu Guo; Xiaoguang Lu; Xin Kang; Yi Song; Dianbo Gong
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.