Literature DB >> 10829126

Differential recall of central and peripheral details of emotional slides is not a stable phenomenon.

I Wessel1, P van der Kooy, H Merckelbach.   

Abstract

A number of studies have reported that central information of an emotional scene is well retained, whereas peripheral details of such a scene are poorly recalled. Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis that attentional narrowing is responsible for this phenomenon. In addition, an attempt was made to increase the ecological validity of the experiment by giving extensive self-relevant instructions. Results showed that, although an emotional slide elicited eye-movements consistent with attentional narrowing, the corresponding recall patterns were absent. Experiments 2 and 3 explored some of the variables that might be responsible for the latter result. Experiment 2, relying on the original design of Christianson and E.F. Loftus (1991), found enhanced recall of central information of an emotional scene. Experiment 3 systematically varied stimulus exposure and interstimulus interval durations. However, the results of this experiment were rather complex and did not fully support the predicted differential recall patterns. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed. It is suggested that other methods (e.g. increasing levels of emotion rather than involvement) may be more suitable for testing the attentional narrowing hypothesis of emotional memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10829126     DOI: 10.1080/096582100387641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  10 in total

1.  How arousal modulates memory: disentangling the effects of attention and retention.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effects of emotion on item and source memory in young and older adults.

Authors:  Patrick S R Davidson; Craig P McFarland; Elizabeth L Glisky
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Impact of individual differences upon emotion-induced memory trade-offs.

Authors:  Jill D Waring; Jessica D Payne; Daniel L Schacter; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 4.  Patients' memory for medical information.

Authors:  Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 18.000

5.  Eye movement monitoring reveals differential influences of emotion on memory.

Authors:  Lily Riggs; Douglas A McQuiggan; Adam K Anderson; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-25

6.  Effects of emotional context on memory for details: the role of attention.

Authors:  Johann Sung-Cheul Kim; Gerhard Vossel; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effects of stress on eyewitness memory: A survey of memory experts and laypeople.

Authors:  Carey Marr; Henry Otgaar; Melanie Sauerland; Conny W E M Quaedflieg; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-25

8.  The role of psychosocial factors in patients' recollections of breast reconstruction options discussed with their surgeons.

Authors:  Haoqi Wang; Jun Liu; Mary Catherine Bordes; Deepti Chopra; Gregory P Reece; Mia K Markey; Aubri S Hoffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Eye movements predict recollective experience.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Matthew L Davidson; Meredith M Carson; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do parents recall and understand children's weight status information after BMI screening? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna M Dawson; Rachael W Taylor; Sheila M Williams; Barry J Taylor; Deirdre A Brown
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.