Literature DB >> 10828920

Cervical discography: clinical implications from 12 years of experience.

S A Grubb1, C K Kelly.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Positive pain responses provoked in an inclusive series of cervical discograms performed over a 12-year period were categorized by level and reviewed.
OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence of cervical pathology over an entire series of patients, to determine whether a reproducible pattern of concordant pain could be associated with each symptomatic level identified, and to calculate the rate of complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cloward wrote the first articles explaining the technique of cervical discography and reported on the pain responses induced. Currently, the technique is viewed as an invaluable diagnostic tool, but it also is criticized for failing to contribute unique information beyond that available from imaging studies despite the inherent risks.
METHODS: A series of 173 cervical discograms performed over 12 years was examined. Pain responses provoked and recorded during discography were grouped by disc level and examined for recurring patterns. The prevalence of disc pathology was calculated.
RESULTS: In all, 807 discs were injected, and 404 concordant pain responses (50%) were elicited. Three or more abnormal disc levels were identified in more than half of the patients. Complications developed in four patients (2.3%). No further complications were reported. Surgical treatment was indicated as viable in only 35 studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Discography is a safe and valuable diagnostic procedure showing characteristic pain patterns that may have clinical significance. In more than half of the studies, three or more levels were identified as pain generators, suggesting that treatment decisions based on information from fewer discs injected during discography may be tenuous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10828920     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  Localizing value of pain distribution patterns in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Krishnapundha Bunyaratavej; Peerapong Montriwiwatnchai; Rungsak Siwanuwatn; Surachai Khaoroptham
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 2.  Cervicogenic headache: a review comparison with migraine, tension-type headache, and whiplash.

Authors:  Maurice B Vincent
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-06

3.  Diskography: infectious complications from a series of 12,634 cases.

Authors:  R S Pobiel; K P Schellhas; S R Pollei; B A Johnson; M J Golden; J A Eklund
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Intradiscal corticosteroid injections in spondylotic cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Fouad Fayad; François Rannou; Jean Luc Drapé; Lamia Rahmani; Marie-Martine Lefevre-Colau; Alain Nys; Serge Poiraudeau; Michel Ledoux; Alain Chevrot; Michel Revel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Headache and neck.

Authors:  Maurice B Vincent
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-08

6.  Disc associating axial pain were indicated by PLL resection in ACDF surgery.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Yuan Xue; Ying Zhao; Yaqi Zong; Chao Sun; Bo Pei; Pei Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Chronic Neck Pain and Cervicogenic Headaches.

Authors:  Frank L. Feng; Jerome Schofferman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Cervicogenic headache: interventional, anesthetic, and ablative treatment.

Authors:  Steven B Silverman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2002-08

9.  Chronic pain and the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Stephen G Schmidt
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

10.  Chronic shoulder pain referred from thymic carcinoma: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Shu-Wei Dee; Mu-Jung Kao; Chang-Zern Hong; Li-Wei Chou; Henry L Lew
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.