Literature DB >> 10828919

The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms.

E J Carragee1, C M Tanner, S Khurana, C Hayward, J Welsh, E Date, T Truong, M Rossi, C Hagle.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental disc injections in subjects with no history of low back symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: To determine in an experimental setting the relative pain response and pain-related behavior in selected subjects without a history of low back pain undergoing lumbar discography. This study aimed to select a study population that more closely represented patients undergoing discography in clinical practice. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous work has shown that in young, healthy men with little degenerative disc disease and no history of low back problems, discographic injections usually did not cause significant pain. This group differed from the patients who usually undergo discographic evaluation in clinical practice. Most clinical patients are older, have significant degenerative disc disease, have behavioral changes associated with chronic pain, and often have confounding psychosocial troubles. The authors undertook to study discography in subjects without low back pain but with clinical profiles similar to patients undergoing discography in clinical practice.
METHODS: Twenty-six individuals, mean age 43 years, with no history of low back pain had lumber discography according to the strict protocol of Walsh et al. Of these, 10 were pain-free; 10 had chronic neck and arm pain, but no low back symptoms; and 6 had primary somatization disorders without low back symptoms.-
RESULTS: Significant positive pain response and pain-related behavior with discography were found in 10% of the pain-free group, in 40% of the chronic cervical pain group, and in 83% of the somatization disorder group completing the injections. Twenty-four subjects had negative control discs. Discs with annular disruption were more likely to be painful on injection, particularly in those individuals with ongoing compensation issues, chronic pain, or abnormal psychological testing.-
CONCLUSION: If strict criteria are applied, the rate of false-positive discography may be low in subjects with normal psychometric profiles and without chronic pain. Significantly painful injections were very common in subjects with annular disruption and chronic pain or abnormal psychometric testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10828919     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  37 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?

Authors:  David A Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

2.  Comment on the article: a study of clinical predictors of lumbar provocation discography (M. Laslett et al.).

Authors:  M Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Provocative discography screening improves surgical outcome.

Authors:  Petra Margetic; Roman Pavic; Marin F Stancic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Advances in the diagnosis of degenerated lumbar discs and their possible clinical application.

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno; Marta Tibiletti; Keita Ito; Jeremy Fairbank; Fabio Galbusera; Alberto Zerbi; Sally Roberts; Ellen Wachtel; Yulia Merkher; Sarit Sara Sivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Intervertebral discs from spinal nondeformity and deformity patients have different mechanical and matrix properties.

Authors:  Kevin K Cheng; Sigurd H Berven; Serena S Hu; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Acute lower back pain mapped by dermatomal scarification in urban Malawi.

Authors:  Tammy Lo; Alistair Tindall
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-30

7.  The influence of preoperative MRI findings on lumbar fusion clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon; Charles H Crawford; Jason D Zook; Kelly R Bratcher; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Effects of spine loading in a patient with post-decompression lumbar disc herniation: observations using an open weight-bearing MRI.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Daryl Sybert; Tim Law; Brian Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.