Literature DB >> 10828857

Possible relationship between changes in islet neogenesis and islet neogenesis-associated protein-positive cell mass induced by sucrose administration to normal hamsters.

H Del Zotto1, L Massa, R Rafaeloff, G L Pittenger, A Vinik, G Gold, A Reifel-Miller, J J Gagliardino.   

Abstract

The possible relationship between changes in islet cell mass and in islet neogenesis-associated protein (INGAP)-cell mass induced by sucrose administration to normal hamsters was investigated. Normal hamsters were given sucrose (10% in drinking water) for 5 (S8) or 21 (S24) weeks and compared with control (C) fed hamsters. Serum glucose and insulin levels were measured and quantitative immunocytochemistry of the endocrine pancreas was performed. Serum glucose levels were comparable among the groups, while insulin levels were higher in S hamsters. There was a significant increase in beta-cell mass (P<0.02) and in beta-cell 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine index (P<0.01), and a significant decrease in islet volume (P<0.01) only in S8 vs C8 hamsters. Cytokeratin (CK)-labelled cells were detected only in S8 hamsters. INGAP-positive cell mass was significantly larger only in S8 vs C8 hamsters. Endocrine INGAP-positive cells were located at the islet periphery ( approximately 96%), spread within the exocrine pancreas ( approximately 3%), and in ductal cells (<1%) in all groups. INGAP positivity and glucagon co-localization varied according to topographic location and type of treatment. In C8 hamsters, 49.1+/-6. 9% cells were INGAP- and glucagon-positive in the islets, while this percentage decreased by almost half in endocrine extra-insular and ductal cells. In S8 animals, co-expression increased in endocrine extra-insular cells to 36.3+/-9.5%, with similar figures in the islets, decreasing to 19.7+/-6.9% in ductal cells. INGAP-positive cells located at the islet periphery also co-expressed CK. In conclusion, a significant increase of INGAP-positive cell mass was only observed at 8 weeks when neogenesis was present, suggesting that this peptide might participate in the control of islet neogenesis. Thus, INGAP could be a potentially useful tool to treat conditions in which there is a decrease in beta-cell mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10828857     DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1650725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0022-0795            Impact factor:   4.286


  7 in total

1.  Effects of islet neogenesis-associated protein pentadecapeptide on cell mass and insulin secretion of pancreatic β-cells.

Authors:  M Zha; M Zhang; S Shan; K-F Xu; H Chen; X-Y Xu; L Qian; X Han; T Yang
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Pancreatic islet immunoreactivity to the Reg protein INGAP.

Authors:  David A Taylor-Fishwick; Angela Bowman; Maricarmen Korngiebel-Rosique; Aaron I Vinik
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Pancreatic β-Cell Mass as a Pharmacologic Target in Diabetes.

Authors:  Stephen Hanley
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2009-11-16

4.  Prospects and challenges for islet regeneration as a treatment for diabetes: a review of islet neogenesis associated protein.

Authors:  Alexander Fleming; Lawrence Rosenberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

5.  Regenerating proteins and their expression, regulation and signaling.

Authors:  Abhirath Parikh; Anne-Fleur Stephan; Emmanuel S Tzanakakis
Journal:  Biomol Concepts       Date:  2011-11-10

6.  Promoting Effects of Sucrose-rich Diet on N-Nitrosobis (2-oxopropyl) amine-induced Pancreatic Carcinogenesis in Hamsters.

Authors:  Akika Sakamoto; Michishi Goya; Yoko Degawa; Masayuki Mitsui; Toshio Mori; Kazutoshi Tamura; Masahiro Tsutsumi
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 1.628

7.  Molecular mechanisms of tungstate-induced pancreatic plasticity: a transcriptomics approach.

Authors:  Jordi Altirriba; Albert Barbera; Héctor Del Zotto; Belen Nadal; Sandra Piquer; Alex Sánchez-Pla; Juan J Gagliardino; Ramon Gomis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.