Literature DB >> 10828466

Direction biasing by brief apparent motion stimuli.

A J Pantle1, D P Gallogly, O C Piehler.   

Abstract

The perceived direction of a motion step (probe stimulus) can be influenced by an earlier motion step or a brief motion sweep containing a series of steps (biasing stimulus). Depending upon experimental conditions, the biasing of the direction of the probe step (a phase shift of 180 degrees +/-Phi) by a biasing stimulus which precedes it by approximately 250 ms can either increase (positive filter biasing) or decrease (negative filter biasing) the tendency to see the probe move in the biasing direction as computed with a motion filter with a biphasic temporal impulse response. In a series of experiments it was found that biasing motions traversing 90 degrees of phase angle in fewer than six steps in less than 100 ms produced positive filter biasing. Also, biasing of the probe direction could be dissociated from the consciously reported direction of the biasing stimulus, and it did not occur when the probe preceded rather than followed the biasing stimulus. A biasing sweep containing more than six steps traversing 90 degrees or a sweep traversing 270 degrees produced negative filter biasing. Perceptual fusion of the steps of the sweep was not a necessary condition for obtaining negative filter biasing. In general, the negative filter biasing effects were found to be the most pervasive for the conditions investigated, and they are suggestive of a direction-specific, adaptation-like (gain-control) process in first-order motion filters. The exception to the negative biasing rule was found only with biasing stimuli which were short in duration or distance spanned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10828466     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00071-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Neural correlates of perceptual priming of visual motion.

Authors:  Yang Jiang; Yue J Luo; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Individual differences in visual motion perception and neurotransmitter concentrations in the human brain.

Authors:  Tatsuto Takeuchi; Sanae Yoshimoto; Yasuhiro Shimada; Takanori Kochiyama; Hirohito M Kondo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Processing unrelated language can change what you see.

Authors:  Alexia Toskos Dils; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

4.  Perceived causality can alter the perceived trajectory of apparent motion.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Kim; Jacob Feldman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-08

5.  Adaptation to Complex Pictures: Exposure to Emotional Valence Induces Assimilative Aftereffects.

Authors:  Rocco Palumbo; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Angelica Quercia; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  Common and independent processing of visual motion perception and oculomotor response.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Tomoyuki Hayasaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual priming of two-step motion sequences.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Nathan H Heller; Maxwell J Schooley; Sean G McDougall
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Different coding strategies for the perception of stable and changeable facial attributes.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.