Literature DB >> 10828374

Clinical application of event-related potentials in dementing illness: issues and problems.

G Barrett1.   

Abstract

Many of the problems associated with the clinical application of event-related potentials (ERPs) are well recognized. These include the broad inter-subject variability of peak latencies and amplitudes in control groups, as well as the apparent non-specificity of some ERP tests. In addition, it is often the case that the same test yields a different proportion of 'hits' (in terms of identification of abnormality in patients classified by other means as having dementia) when used by different research groups. This is almost certainly due to differences in the disease state of the patients being tested. The difference between hit rates identifies another important factor which is not often considered in the application of ERP tests in clinical medicine. This is that although an ERP test may identify abnormality in the later stages of disease, the true task for the test is to identify abnormality in early disease when evidence of cognitive dysfunction will be different and less frank than in later stages of the disorder. It is therefore, necessary to identify the cognitive deficits associated with the early stages of dementia and devise appropriate ERP tests to detect these deficits. A recent paper by Fox et al. (Fox, N.C., Warrington, E.K., Seiffer, A.L., Agnew, S.K., Rossor, M.N., 1998. Presymptomatic cognitive deficits in individuals at risk of familial Alzheimer's disease. A longitudinal prospective study. Brain 121, 1631-1639.) suggests that ERP tests of verbal memory function may be the most sensitive for detecting the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10828374     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00094-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  3 in total

1.  Brain event-related potentials: diagnosing early-stage Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; Geoffrey H Nowlis; John W McCrary; John A Chapman; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Margaret N Gardner; Lindsey A Reilly
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Does incongruence of lexicosemantic and prosodic information cause discernible cognitive conflict?

Authors:  Rachel L C Mitchell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Inhibition deficit in the spatial tendency of the response in multiple-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment. An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Jesús Cespón; Santiago Galdo-Álvarez; Fernando Díaz
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.