Literature DB >> 10827375

Predictors of recurrent ischemic events and death in unstable coronary artery disease after treatment with combination antithrombotic therapy.

M Cohen1, S S Stinnett, B D Weatherley, E P Gurfinkel, G J Fromell, S G Goodman, K A Fox, R M Califf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-Q-wave acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have substantial rates of recurrent ischemic events, but prognostic studies have been small or preceded the routine use of aggressive combination antithrombotic therapy. We sought to identify predictors of these events after antithrombotic treatment of non-Q-wave ACS.
METHODS: We assessed 30-day rates of a composite triple end point (death, infarction, or refractory angina) and double end point (death or infarction) among 3171 patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS randomly assigned to enoxaparin or heparin, plus aspirin, for 2 to 8 days. We created multivariable regression models to predict these end points from baseline factors.
RESULTS: Overall, 682 patients (21%) reached the triple end point and 220 (6.8%) reached the double end point. Independent predictors of the triple end point were admission with myocardial necrosis, ST-segment depression, prior angina severity, symptom duration, and allocation to enoxaparin treatment in patients with ST-segment depression (significant interaction). Independent predictors of the double end point were admission with myocardial necrosis, ST-segment depression, enrollment region, age >75 years, prior angina severity, and rales. By deciles, the average predicted risk for the double end point ranged from 2% to 20%: a patient aged <75 years with no risk factors had a 3.5% risk, whereas a patient aged >75 years with 2 additional high-risk features (myonecrosis and ST depression) had a risk of death or reinfarction of 26%.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS exhibit a broad range of risk of adverse recurrent ischemic events. The predictive power of the model for the triple end point, using baseline variables, was modest. However, a subgroup at very low risk of the double end point (average 2%) can be identified with baseline variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10827375     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.106915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

Review 1.  Explicit risk in acute coronary syndrome management.

Authors:  Merril L Knudtson; Colleen M Norris; P Diane Galbraith; Jaro Hubacek; William A Ghali
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Predictive models for short- and long-term adverse outcomes following discharge in a contemporary population with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Dharam J Kumbhani; Brian J Wells; A Michael Lincoff; Anil Jain; Susana Arrigain; Changhong Yu; Marlene Goormastic; Stephen G Ellis; Eugene Blackstone; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-02-17

3.  Enoxaparin in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: treatment benefits in prespecified subgroups.

Authors:  M Cohen; E M Antman; E P Gurfinkel; D Radley
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain and normal troponin concentrations.

Authors:  J Sanchis; V Bodí; A Llácer; J Núñez; L Consuegra; M J Bosch; V Bertomeu; V Ruiz; F J Chorro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Learning on the Web. Case 3: acute chest pain.

Authors:  Christopher S R Baker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.