Literature DB >> 10827299

Public opinion and rationing in the United Kingdom.

D King1, A Maynard.   

Abstract

In the United Kingdom and as in all other countries, health care professionals ration access to diagnosis and treatment. Throughout its history there has been a reluctance to acknowledge the existence, let alone the nature of rationing processes and public opinion about them. Several health policy reforms are discussed with reference to their approach to dealing with the scarcity of health care resources. Data taken form the 1998 Eurobarometer Survey are analysed to examine public opinion regarding rationing issues, such as funding for health care, the need to set limits in health coverage, the role of stakeholders in setting priorities, and the use of age, and other factors, as a criteria for setting priorities.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10827299     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00063-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

Review 1.  The ethics and reality of rationing in medicine.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Douglas B White
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.

Authors:  Gisselle Gallego; Susan J Taylor; Paul McNeill; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Age as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public view.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jeannette Winkelhage; Norman Wirsik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus.

Authors:  Antonis Farmakas; Mamas Theodorou; Petros Galanis; Georgios Karayiannis; Stefanos Ghobrial; Nikos Polyzos; Evridiki Papastavrou; Eirini Agapidaki; Kyriakos Souliotis
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2017-08-09

5.  Trials are already being prioritised, just not at the institutional level.

Authors:  Simon Kolstoe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Effect of 'lifestyle stigma' on public support for NHS-provisioned pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and preventative interventions for HPV and type 2 diabetes: a nationwide UK survey.

Authors:  Timothy Hildebrandt; Leticia Bode; Jessica S C Ng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.