Literature DB >> 10827297

Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway.

J Calltorp1.   

Abstract

The development of priority setting policies has been an important part of the national agenda for health services in Sweden and Norway during the past 10 years. Both countries have health systems with a pronounced public character and a declared emphasis on equity and solidarity. Both countries have also had National Priority Commissions that have developed general documents providing advice, but not very detailed guidelines, on how to set priorities. Resource constraints and the rapid restructuring of the health care system were important characteristics forming the background for the National Priority Commission in Sweden (1995). In Norway, the starting point for the first-ever Priority Commission in the world (1987) was how to set limits for health care in a society with rapidly increasing wealth. The second Norwegian Commission (1997) critically reviewed the effects of the general principles for priority setting that have been put forward, and demonstrated the importance to link them to steering tools within health care services.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10827297     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00061-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Authors:  Chris James; Guy Carrin; William Savedoff; Piya Hanvoravongchai
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

Review 2.  One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.

Authors:  Mita Giacomini
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Priority setting in health care: trends and models from Scandinavian experiences.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

4.  An ethical analysis of international health priority-setting.

Authors:  Nuala Kenny; Christine Joffres
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-08-15

5.  The current status of decision-making procedures and quality assurance in Europe: an overview.

Authors:  L Valerio; W Ricciardi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-11

6.  Opinions of Swedish citizens, health-care politicians, administrators and doctors on rationing and health-care financing.

Authors:  Per Rosén; Ingvar Karlberg
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Appointment Lead Time Policy Development to Improve Patient Access to Care.

Authors:  Yu-Li Huang; Sarah M Bach
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 8.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Yasaman Vali; Heidrun Sturm; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-04

9.  Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Reidar K Lie
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2008-01-21

10.  Factors explaining priority setting at community mental health centres: a quantitative analysis of referral assessments.

Authors:  Sverre Grepperud; Per Arne Holman; Knut Reidar Wangen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.