Literature DB >> 10827292

Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey.

E Mossialos1, D King.   

Abstract

While many studies have reviewed the issues involved in rationing and priority setting within health care services, few studies have comprehensively analysed the views and attitudes of a significant stakeholder in the debate - the public. The aims of this paper are to discuss the issues involved in involving the public in rationing and priority setting decision-making; and to analyse data pertaining to citizen's attitudes towards rationing and priority setting. The data analysed were taken from the 1998 Eurobarometer Survey, with specific questions pertaining to rationing and priority setting asked in six countries within the European Union: Germany; France; Italy; the Netherlands; Britain and Sweden. The review of previous studies and the analysis of the Eurobarometer data, focus on issues relating to funding for health care; the need to set limits in health coverage; the role of stakeholders in setting priorities; and the use of age, and other factors, as a criteria for setting priorities.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10827292     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  19 in total

Review 1.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.

Authors:  Gisselle Gallego; Susan J Taylor; Paul McNeill; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Authors:  Chris James; Guy Carrin; William Savedoff; Piya Hanvoravongchai
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  The current status of decision-making procedures and quality assurance in Europe: an overview.

Authors:  L Valerio; W Ricciardi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-11

7.  Challenges in measuring the societal value of orphan drugs: insights from a canadian stated preference survey.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Shirin Rizzardo; Nick Bansback; Craig Mitton; Carlo A Marra; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  The public's priorities in health services.

Authors:  Giora Kaplan; Orna Baron-Epel
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Opinions of Swedish citizens, health-care politicians, administrators and doctors on rationing and health-care financing.

Authors:  Per Rosén; Ingvar Karlberg
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Israeli lay persons' views on priority-setting criteria for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Perla Werner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.